Effect of Localized Wall Heating/Cooling on the Unsteady MHD Decelerating Flow over a Wedge
C. Poornima^{1}^{, *}, A. T. Eswara^{2}
^{1}Department of Mathematics, P.E.S. College of Engineering, Mandya, India
^{2}Department of Mathematics, GSSS Institute of Engineering and Technology for Women, Mysore, India
Abstract
The present paper investigates the effect of localized wall heating/cooling on the unsteady, MHD laminar boundary layer decelerating forced flow of an incompressible electrically conducting fluid over a wedge. The set of nonlinear partial differential equations governing the semisimilar flow has been solved numerically using an implicit finite difference scheme along with the quasilinearization technique. Numerical computations has been carried out and the results are presented graphically to show the effect of various physical parameters such as unsteady parameter, magnetic parameter, wall heating/cooling parameter on the flow field and heat transfer characteristics. It is found that the dual solutions exist for critical values of the unsteady parameter. Further, the magnetic field plays a significant role in controlling the boundary layer separation.
Keywords
Unsteady Decelerating Flow, SemiSimilar Solution, Localized Wall Heating (Cooling), Skin Friction, Heat Transfer
Received: July 6, 2015
Accepted: July 23, 2015
Published online: August 5, 2015
@ 2015 The Authors. Published by American Institute of Science. This Open Access article is under the CC BYNC license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/4.0/
1. Introduction
The study of laminar boundary layer flows is always important from the view point of engineering and technology. The twodimensional incompressible laminar boundary layer flow passing over a wedge was first introduced by Falkner and Skan [1]. In the past few years several investigations [210] have been reported in the literature focusing on this topic using various methods which is suitable for the flow and heat transfer phenomena. In recent years, the application of a transverse magnetic field on boundary layer flow control has made a great impact in the study of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow and heat transfer problems having technological applications in modern metallurgical and metalworking processes. MHD effects on the FalknerSkan wedge flow are studied by Kafoussias [11] and Devi [12].
In forced convection laminar boundary layer flow over a wedge, the pressure gradient parameter tends to increase the skin friction as well as heat transfer. However, it is possible to reduce the skin friction and heat transfer by localized heating/cooling of the surface. The process of localized wallheating/cooling (in which a certain portion of the wall is being heated or cooled while the remaining portion is unchanged) s of vital importance for various scientific and technological potential applications including the controlling of the laminar boundary layer flow separation. The heated surface can also be cooled by removing the heat source from the localized slots on the surface. Indeed, localized wall heating/cooling promotes energizing of the inner portion of boundary layer in adverse pressure gradient and plays a key role in boundary layer control [13,14]. In spite of its several applications, there are only few papers in the literature that deals with localized wall heating/cooling. Chamkha et. al [15] have studied the mixed convection flow over a vertical flat plate with localized wall heating(cooling) including the effects of magnetic field, suction and injection. Kumari and Nath [16] have investigated the mixed convection flow over a thin vertical cylinder with localized suction/injection and wall heating/cooling. Recently, Poornima and Eswara [17] have considered steady, MHD FalknerSkan flow over a wedge with localized wall heating (cooling).
The main purpose of the present paper is to discuss the unsteady laminar boundary layer forced convection decelerating flow of an electrically conducting fluid over a sharp wedge in the presence of a transverse magnetic field with localized wall heating/cooling. The nonlinear parabolic partial differential equations governing the semisimilar flow have been solved numerically using an implicit finite difference scheme along with quasilinearization technique. The present analysis may be useful in industrial applications dealing with controlling as well as stabilization of the boundary layer. It may be mentioned here that the counter part of the present investigation pertaining to the accelerating flow has been studied more recently by Poornima and Eswara [18].
2. Mathematical Analysis
Consider the unsteady, twodimensional laminar boundary layer forced convection flow of an incompressible electrically conducting viscous fluid flowing towards a wedge [Fig.1], where is measured along the surface of the wedge and is normal to it. The unsteadiness in the flow field is introduced by the free stream velocity . A transverse magnetic filed is applied in the direction normal to the wedge surface and, it is assumed that the magnetic Reynolds number is small, so that the induced magnetic field can be neglected. Hence, the applied magnetic field contributes only to the Lorentz force which acts in the  direction. No electric field is assumed to exist and the Hall effect is negligible. The fluid properties are assumed to be constant.
The surface of the heated wedge is maintained at a constant temperature except at certain portions of the wedge where it varies slowly with the streamwise distance.
Under the aforesaid assumptions and neglecting the viscous dissipation, the nonlinear boundary layer equations governing the unsteady, MHD forced convection flow past a wedge are
Equation of Continuity:
(1)
Equation of Momentum:
(2)
Equation of Energy:
(3)
The boundary conditions to be satisfied by the above equations are:
Where
; (4)
Here and are respectively, velocity components in and directions of the flow; is the inviscid flow velocity at the edge of the boundary layer ; is the thermal diffusivity of the fluid; T is the temperature in the vicinity of the wedge; T_{0} is the constant temperature; t and t^{*} are dimensional and dimensionless time;, are respectively, electrical conductivity, density and kinematic viscosity; L is characteristic length; is the FalknerSkan powerlaw parameter; The subscripts and denote conditions at the wall and in the free stream respectively; is a dimensionless constant and, or < 0, according to whether the wall is being heated or cooled. For, the entire wall is maintained at constant temperature. Also, when value is zero, the problem reduces to steady case. For the nonzero value of, the flow is accelerating if, provided and, the flow is decelerating if.Assuming the value zero to, the problem reduces to the steady case. It is appropriate to point out here that numerical results pertaining to decelerating flow are obtained and discussed in this paper, since results of accelerating flow are already been published in a reputed journal.
Introducing the following transformations:
(5)
to Eqns.(1)(3), we see that continuity equation (1) is identically satisfied and Eqns.(2) and (3) reduce, respectively, to:
(6)
(7)
where
; ;
; (8)
The transformed boundary conditions are:
for
for (9)
Here, andare dimensional and dimensionless stream functions respectively; F and G are the dimensionless velocity and temperature; is dimensionless magnetic parameter; is the local Reynolds number, is the Prandtl number; and are the transformed coordinates; is the pressure gradient parameter. Here prime ( ' ) denotes derivate with respect to while, subscript represents partial derivatives with respect to . We also note that in Eqn.(5), the parameter is connected with the apex angle by the relation . It is noted that the dimensionless wall temperature G (,0) given in the boundary condition (9) is a continuous function of the dimensionless streamwise distance with a small change in the interval over the constant value 1. The increase or reduction in the wall temperature in the interval by the constant value introduces a finite discontinuity at the leading and trailing edges of the slot and this causes difficulties in the solution of the equation. In order to avoid these difficulties in obtaining stable numerical solutions, a nonuniform distribution of wall temperature in the interval has been taken, which varies slowly withand is continuous in the slot.
The quantities of engineering interest are the local skin friction and heat transfer coefficient in the form of Nusselt number, and these are expressed, respectively, as:
(10)
It is worth mentioning here that when, the Eqns. (6) and (7) become
(11)
(12)
which have been considered recently by Poornima and Eswara [17], representing the steady counterpart of the present investigation.
3. Results and Discussion
The system of nonlinear partial differential equations (6) and (7) along with the boundary conditions (9) has been solved numerically employing an implicit finite difference scheme along with quasilinearization technique [19]. It may be noted that for computation purpose, two slots have been located at the intervals [0.5, 1.5] and [3.5, 4.5] and the surface is heated or cooled in these intervals only. In the remaining portion of the wedge surface, the surface is nonpermeable and is maintained at constant temperature. In fact, analysis has been carried out for the wedge angle 45^{o} i.e., as the FalknerSkan oneparameter family of solutions of the boundary layer equations has proved to be very useful in the interpretation of fluid flows at large Reynolds number. The results are illustrated graphically and are presented in Figs. 36.
In order to assess the accuracy of our numerical method used, we have compared the steady state results with those of White [20] [See Table 1], and Poornima and Eswara [17] [See Fig.2]. The results are found to be in excellent agreement.

 
Present  White[20]  Present  White[20]  
0.0  0.0000  0.0000  0.0000  0.0000 
0.2  0.0094  0.00939  0.0940  0.09391 
0.4  0.0376  0.03755  0.1876  0.18761 
0.6  0.0846  0.08439  0.2806  0.28058 
0.8  0.1500  0.14967  0.3720  0.37196 
1.0  0.2335  0.23299  0.4606  0.46063 
2.0  0.8882  0.88680  0.8170  0.81669 
3.0  1.7978  1.79557  0.9690  0.96905 
4.0  2.7864  2.78388  0.9978  0.99777 
5.0  3.7833  3.78323  1.0000  0.99994 
Fig. 3, shows the effect of increase in the magnetic field on skin friction and heat transfer coefficients for (wall heating), (45^{0}), and . It is clear that, as M increases both and increases. Meanwhile, the existence of the dual solution for the localized wall heating ( = 0.2) are noticed for0 where is a critical value of Indeed, dual solutions exist up to a critical value , beyond which the boundary layer separates from the wedge surface and the solution based upon the boundary layer approximations are not possible. Moreover, the critical values of for are and for when M increases from 0.0 to 1.0. It is significant to observe the role of magnetic field in the process of stabilization of the boundary layer decelerating flow during this short time. Similar trend is obtained for localized wall cooling ( = 0.2) and it is not presented here for the sake of brevity.
The variation of the velocity profile (F) and temperature profile (G) with the effect of magnetic field are plotted in Fig.4. These profiles satisfy the far field boundary conditions asymptotically, which support the obtained numerical results. In fact, the laminar boundary layer is thicker for the second solution in comparison with that of the first solution in both of these velocity and thermal profiles. It is remarked that the upper branch solutions (first solution) are stable and physically realistic, while the lower branch solutions (second solution) are not. Although such (second) solutions are not physically plausible, they are nevertheless of mathematical curiosity [14].
The variation of the skin friction [] and heat transfer [] coefficients with the unsteady parameter (decelerating flow) together with their velocity and temperature profiles are shown in Fig. 5 and 6 for , respectively. It is clear from Fig.4 that, as increases, increases [Fig. 5(a)] and decreases [Fig.5 (b)] whenever there is localized wall heating/cooling or not. It is evident from these figures that velocity increases [Fig. 6(a)] and temperature decreases [Fig. 6(b)] at any point of the region inside laminar boundary layer, with the increase of the unsteady decelerating parameter.
4. Conclusions
In this paper, the problem of unsteady MHD forced convection decelerating flow over a wedge by considering the effect of localized wall heating /cooling has been studied. Semisimilar equations are obtained and solved by using the finite difference method along with quasilinearization technique. The analysis reveals that dual solutions are obtained for the decelerating flow in the presence of localized wall heating/cooling. Further it is found that the application of magnetic field stabilizes the laminar boundary layer flow and consequently delays the boundary layer separation.
Acknowledgment
The authors are thankful to PETRF and the Department of Mathematics, P.E.S. College of Engineering, Mandya  571 401, for providing fabulous facilities for research work.
References