International Journal of Mathematics and Computational Science, Vol. 1, No. 3, June 2015 Publish Date: May 16, 2015 Pages: 111-115

Fixed Point Theorems in Fuzzy Normed Spaces for Weak Contractive Mappings

S. A. M. Mohsenialhosseini*

Faculty of Mathematics, Vali-e-Asr University, Rafsanjan, Iran

‎‎Abstract

We define fixed point for the class of weak contractive type mappings in fuzzy normed spaces. We obtain several convergence theorems for fixed points by means of Picard iteration on fuzzy normed spaces. These extend the corresponding results in literature by providing error estimates, rate of convergence for the used iterative method as well as results concerning the data dependence of the fixed points on fuzzy norm spaces.

‎‎‎Keywords

‎‎‎Fuzzy Normed Space, Fuzzy Fixed Point, Weak Contraction, Convergence Theorem


1. Introduction

Nowadays, fixed point play an important role in different areas of‎ ‎mathematics, and its applications, particularly in mathematics, physics, differential equation‎‎. For details, one can refer to, Amann, [1] Franklin, [2] Mohsenalhosseini et al. [3]. Since fuzzy mathematics and fuzzy physics along‎ ‎with the classical ones are constantly developing, the fuzzy type of the fixed point can also play an important role in the new fuzzy area. Some mathematicians have defined fuzzy norms on a vector space from various points of view [4], [5].

Chitra and Mordeson [6] introduce a definition of norm fuzzy and thereafter the concept of fuzzy norm space has been introduced and generalized in different ways by Bag and Samanta in [7], [8], [9].

In this paper, starting from the article of Berinde [10], we study some well-known contractive type mappings on fuzzy normed spaces, and we give some fuzzy approximate fixed points of such mappings.

2. Some Preliminary Results

Throughout this article, the symbols and mean the min and the max, respectively. We now start our work with the following:

Definition 2.1. [7] Let U be a linear space on  A function is called fuzzy norm if and only if for every and for every  the  following properties  are satisfied:

(F1) :  for every ,

(F2) :  if and only if  for every ,

(F3) :  for every and ,

(F4) : for every

,

(F5) : the function  is nondecreasing on

and .

(F6) :

(F7) : The function  is continuous for every , and on subset is strictly increasing.

Let be a fuzzy norm space. For all we define -norm on as follows:‎‎

                 (1)

for every

Definition 2.2. [11] ‎‎‎‎Let be a fuzzy normed space, and The is a -approximate fixed point (fuzzy approximate fixed point) of if for some

Definition 2.3. [11] A mapping is a F-Kannan operator if there exists such that

for all

3. Fuzzy ‎‎‎Fixed Point

Definition 3.1. A mapping is called -‎‎‎weak contraction or ‎‎-contraction if there exist a constant‎‎‎ and some such that ‎‎

                       (2)

‎‎‎‎‎for all ‎‎‎

Remark 3.2.‎‎Due to the symmetry of the distance, the weak contraction condition (2) implicitly includes the following dual one

                     (3)

for all ‎‎

Remark 3.3. In the rest of the paper we will denote the set of all -fixed points of by

              (4)

for ‎‎some

Proposition 3.4‎‎. Let be a fuzzy normed space and is an -weak contraction. Then

1)    ‎‎

2)    ‎‎The Picard iteration ‎‎given by

converges to‎ ‎ for any

3)    The following estimates

A)                      (5)

‎‎‎for

B)                    (6)

for

‎‎hold, where‎‎‎‎is constant. ‎‎

Proof: Let be the Picard iteration, starting from arbitrary. Then by (2) we have

By the Picard iteration of, we have

By induction ‎‎

and hence

‎‎‎which yields

                (7)

all Since,

from (7) we obtain

             (8)

‎‎Now by letting ‎‎ in (8) and (7) we obtain the estimates (5) and (6), respectively.

Proposition 3.5‎‎‎‎. Let be a fuzzy normed space and is an -weak contraction for which there exist and some such that

                         (9)

‎‎‎‎‎‎for all  Then

1)      ‎‎‎‎has a unique -fixed point, i.e.  

2)      The Picard iteration given by

converges tofor any

3)      The a priori and a posteriori error estimates

A)                      (10)

for ‎‎‎

B)                         (11)

‎‎for

hold.

4)      The rate of convergence of the Picard iteration is given by

                    (12)

Proof: Let be the Picard iteration, starting from arbitrary. Then by (2) we have

By the Picard iteration of, we have

By induction ‎‎

and hence

‎‎‎‎which yields

               (13)

‎‎for all Since,

from (13) we obtain

                  (14)

‎‎Now by letting ‎‎ in (14) and (13) we obtain the estimates (10) and (11), respectively.‎ ‎‎‎‎

‎‎‎‎‎‎‎Again, by (2) we have

                        (15)

‎‎‎‎where ‎‎,.

Take ‎‎in (15‎‎‎) to obtain

that is, the estimate (12).

Remark 3.6.Note that, by the symmetry of the distance, (9‎‎) is satisfied for all ‎‎ if and only if

                   (16)

also holds,‎ ‎‎‎‎‎‎for all  

Corollary 3.7‎‎‎. Let be a fuzzy normed space and is an F-Kannan operator  Then

1)      has a unique -fixed point, i.e.  

2)      The Picard iteration given by

converges tofor any

3)      ‎‎‎The a priori and a posteriori error estimates

for ‎‎‎

‎‎for

hold.

4)      The rate of convergence of the Picard iteration is given by

Proof:  By Definition‎ ‎2.3. and triangle rule, we get

Therefore

Then‎‎‎‎

for all ‎‎‎‎ i.e., in view of  Definition‎ ‎‎3.1. holds with ‎‎‎‎ ‎ ‎‎,.

‎‎‎‎‎Since F-Kannan operator is symmetric with respect to and

 (3) also holds.‎ ‎In a similar way, by the same   Definition ‎‎2.3. and triangle rule, we get

‎‎Therefore

Then‎‎‎‎

for all ‎‎which shows that (9‎‎) and (16‎‎‎) hold with ‎‎,.

Acknowledgments

The authors are extremely grateful to the referees for their helpful suggestions for the improvement of the paper.

References

  1. H. Amann, Fixed point equations and nonlinear eigenvalue problems inor4'ed Banach spaces, SIAM Rev., 18(2) (1976), 620-709.
  2. J. Franklin, Methods of Mathematical Economics, Springer Verlag, NewYork, (1980).
  3. S.A.M. Mohsenalhosseini, H. Mazaheri, M.A. Dehghanand M. Bagheshahi,"Application of Approximate Best Proximity Pairs," Gen. Math. Notes, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp.59-65, 2011.
  4. S. V. Krishna and K. K.M. Sarma, "Separation of fuzzy normed linear spaces," Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 207-217, 1994.
  5. J.-z. Xiao and X.-h. Zhu, "Fuzzy normed space of operators and its completeness," Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 389–399, 2003.
  6. A. Chitra, P.V., "Mordeson, "Fuzzy linear operators and fuzzy normed linear spaces,"Bull. Cal. Math.Soc, vol. 74, pp. 660-665, 1969.
  7. T. Bag, S. K. Samanta, "Finite dimensional fuzzy normed linear spaces,"J. Fuzzy Math, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 687-705, 2003.
  8. T. Bag, S. K. Samanta, "Fuzzy bounded linear opera- tors,"Fuzzy Sets syst,  vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 513-547, 2005.
  9. T. Bag, S. K. Samanta, "Some fixed point theorems in fuzzy normed linear spaces," Information Sciences, 177 pp. 3271-3289, 2007.
  10. V. Berinde, "On the Approximation of Fixed Points of Weak Contractive Mappings," Carpathian J. Math, vol 19, no. 1, pp. 7-22, 2003.
  11. S. A. M. Mohsenalhosseini1 and H.Mazaheri, " Approx- imate Fixed Point Theorems in Fuzzy normed Spaces s for an Operator," Advances in Fuzzy Systems, Volume 2013, Article ID 613604, 8 pages.

600 ATLANTIC AVE, BOSTON,
MA 02210, USA
+001-6179630233
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - 2016 American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.