Fixed Point Theorems in Fuzzy Normed Spaces for Weak Contractive Mappings
S. A. M. Mohsenialhosseini*
Faculty of Mathematics, Vali-e-Asr University, Rafsanjan, Iran
Abstract
We define fixed point for the class of weak contractive type mappings in fuzzy normed spaces. We obtain several convergence theorems for fixed points by means of Picard iteration on fuzzy normed spaces. These extend the corresponding results in literature by providing error estimates, rate of convergence for the used iterative method as well as results concerning the data dependence of the fixed points on fuzzy norm spaces.
Keywords
Fuzzy Normed Space, Fuzzy Fixed Point, Weak Contraction, Convergence Theorem
Received: April 6, 2015 / Accepted: April 22, 2015 / Published online: May 11, 2015
@ 2015 The Authors. Published by American Institute of Science. This Open Access article is under the CC BY-NC license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
1. Introduction
Nowadays, fixed point play an important role in different areas of mathematics, and its applications, particularly in mathematics, physics, differential equation. For details, one can refer to, Amann, [1] Franklin, [2] Mohsenalhosseini et al. [3]. Since fuzzy mathematics and fuzzy physics along with the classical ones are constantly developing, the fuzzy type of the fixed point can also play an important role in the new fuzzy area. Some mathematicians have defined fuzzy norms on a vector space from various points of view [4], [5].
Chitra and Mordeson [6] introduce a definition of norm fuzzy and thereafter the concept of fuzzy norm space has been introduced and generalized in different ways by Bag and Samanta in [7], [8], [9].
In this paper, starting from the article of Berinde [10], we study some well-known contractive type mappings on fuzzy normed spaces, and we give some fuzzy approximate fixed points of such mappings.
2. Some Preliminary Results
Throughout this article, the symbols ∧ and ∨ mean the min and the max, respectively. We now start our work with the following:
Definition 2.1. [7] Let U be a linear space on
A function
is called fuzzy norm if and only if for every
and for every
the following properties are satisfied:
(F1) :
for every
,
(F2) :
if and only if
for every
,
(F3) :
for every
and
,
(F4) :
for every
,
(F5) : the function
is nondecreasing on ![]()
and
.
(F6) : ![]()
![]()
(F7) : The function
is continuous for every
, and on subset
is strictly increasing.
Let
be a fuzzy norm space. For all
we define
-norm on
as follows:
(1)
for every ![]()
Definition 2.2. [11] Let
be a fuzzy normed space, ![]()
and
The
is a
-approximate fixed point (fuzzy approximate fixed point) of
if for some ![]()
![]()
Definition 2.3. [11] A mapping
is a F-Kannan operator if there exists
such that

for all ![]()
3. Fuzzy Fixed Point
Definition 3.1. A mapping
is called
-weak contraction or
-contraction if there exist a constant
and some
such that
(2)
for all
Remark 3.2. Due to the symmetry of the distance, the weak contraction condition (2) implicitly includes the following dual one
(3)
for all
Remark 3.3. In the rest of the paper we will denote the set of all
-fixed points of
by
(4)
for some ![]()
Proposition 3.4. Let
be a fuzzy normed space and
is an
-weak contraction. Then
1) ![]()
2) The Picard iteration
given by
![]()
converges to
for any ![]()
3) The following estimates
A)
(5)
for ![]()
B)
(6)
for ![]()
hold, where
is constant.
Proof: Let
be the Picard iteration, starting from
arbitrary. Then by (2) we have

By the Picard iteration of
, we have

By induction
![]()
and hence
![]()
which yields
(7)
all
Since,
![]()
from (7) we obtain
(8)
Now by letting
in (8) and (7) we obtain the estimates (5) and (6), respectively.
Proposition 3.5. Let
be a fuzzy normed space and
is an
-weak contraction for which there exist
and some
such that
(9)
for all
Then
1)
has a unique
-fixed point, i.e.
2) The Picard iteration
given by
![]()
converges to
for any ![]()
3) The a priori and a posteriori error estimates
A)
(10)
for
B)
(11)
for ![]()
hold.
4) The rate of convergence of the Picard iteration is given by
(12)
Proof: Let
be the Picard iteration, starting from
arbitrary. Then by (2) we have

By the Picard iteration of
, we have

By induction
![]()
and hence
![]()
which yields
(13)
for all
Since,
![]()
from (13) we obtain
(14)
Now by letting
in (14) and (13) we obtain the estimates (10) and (11), respectively.
Again, by (2) we have
(15)
where
,
.
Take
in (15) to obtain

that is, the estimate (12).
Remark 3.6.Note that, by the symmetry of the distance, (9) is satisfied for all
if and only if
(16)
also holds, for all
Corollary 3.7. Let
be a fuzzy normed space and
is an F-Kannan operator Then
1)
has a unique
-fixed point, i.e.
2) The Picard iteration
given by
![]()
converges to
for any ![]()
3) The a priori and a posteriori error estimates

for

for ![]()
hold.
4) The rate of convergence of the Picard iteration is given by

Proof: By Definition 2.3. and triangle rule, we get

Therefore

Then

for all
i.e., in view of
Definition 3.1. holds with
,
.
Since F-Kannan operator is symmetric with respect to
and
(3) also holds. In a similar way, by the same Definition 2.3. and triangle rule, we get

Therefore

Then

for all
which shows that (9) and (16) hold with
,
.
Acknowledgments
The authors are extremely grateful to the referees for their helpful suggestions for the improvement of the paper.
References