Bsplines Method with Redefined Basis Functions for Solving Barrier Options Pricing Model
J. Rashidinia, Sanaz Jamalzadeh^{*}
School of Mathematics, Iran University of Science & Technology, Narmak, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
In this paper, we construct a numerical method to the solution of BlackScholes partial differential equation modelling Barrier option pricing problem on a single asset. We use finite difference approximations for temporal derivative and then the option price is approximated with the redefined Bspline functions. Stability of this method has been discussed and shown that it is unconditionally stable. The developed method is tested on downandout Barrier problem and the numerical results are reported in tabular form where approximation solutions are compared with exact ones. They show the numerical results are in good agreement with exact solutions.
Keywords
Options Pricing, Redefined Cubic Bspline, Stability
Received: March 16, 2015
Accepted: April 2, 2015
Published online: April 6, 2015
@ 2015 The Authors. Published by American Institute of Science. This Open Access article is under the CC BYNC license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/4.0/
1. Introduction
An option is a contract between two parties about trading the asset at a certain future time. One party is the writer, for example, a bank, who fixes the terms of the option contract and sells the option. The other party is the holder, who purchases the option, paying the market price, which is called premium. Options have a limited life time. The maturity date fixes the time horizon. At this date the rights of the holder expire, and for later times () the option is worthless.There are two basic types of option: call and put. The call option gives the holderthe right to buy the underlying for an agreed price E by the date . The putoption gives the holder the right to sell the underlying for the price by the date. The previously agreed price of the contract is called strike or exercise price.Options with the barrier feature are considered to be the simplest types ofpath dependent options. Barrier options distinctive feature is that the payoff depends not only on the final price of the underlying asset, but also on whether the asset price has breached (onetouch) some barrier level during the life of the option.
Barrier options can be classified into knockout and knockin options. Assuming that the barrier price is , the knockout option can be exercised unlessthe asset price reaches the barrier during the day of purchase and expirationday. The knockin option can be exercised if the asset price overtakes the barrier. The knockout options can be classified into upandout and downandout. The upandout option can be exercised unless the asset price reaches the barrier from below the barrier and the downandout option can be done unless theasset price reaches the barrier from above the barrier. The knockin options can be classified into upandin and downandin. The upandin option can be exercised if the asset reaches the barrier from below the barrier whereas the downandin option can be exercised if the asset price reaches the barrier from above the barrier [1].
Option pricing theory has made a great leap forward since the development of the BlackScholes option pricing model by Fischer Black and Myron Scholes in [2],and by Robert Merton in [3]. In an idealized financial market the price of Barrier options, is governed with BlackScholes equation. We consider the dividendfree BlackScholes equation,
(1.1)
where is the option price, is the risk free interest rate, the volatility and the stock price, associated with a final condition and boundary conditions of the form,
(1.2)
where is the expiry time, we consider a truncated domain Following [4], a simple transformationchanges the BlackScholes equation into a constantcoefficient in the domain,
(1.3)
with the final condition and boundary conditions,
(1.4)
As far as the relevant research in this direction is concerned, we mention that Figlewski and Gao [5] illustrated the application of an adaptive mesh technique to the case of barrier options. Zvan et al. [6], proposed to use an implicit method which has superior convergence (when the barrier is close to the region of interest)and stability properties as well as offering additional flexibility in terms of constructing the spatial grid. For some further reading on Barrier options, the reader may refer to [718].
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present a finite difference approximation to discretize equation (1.3) in time variable. The Bspline collocation method is constructed in Section 3. This method is analysed for stability in Section 4. Comparative numerical results are presented in Section 5.
2. Description of Method
We consider a uniform mesh with the grid points to discretize the region Eachis the vertices of the grid points, where and
Our numerical treatment for solving equation (1.3) using the collocation method with redefined cubic Bsplines is to find an approximate solution to exactsolution in the form,
(2.1)
Where are unknown time dependent parameters need to be determined.
Using approximate solution (2.1) and cubic Bspline, the approximate values at the knots of and its derivatives are determined in terms of the time dependentparameters as,
(2.2)
We define the cubic Bspline for by the following relationin [19] as,
(2.3)
Using (2.2) and boundary conditions (1.4), the approximate solutions at the boundary points are in the form,
(2.4)
and,
(2.5)
Following [20] the procedure for redefining the basis functions is as follows: Our numerical treatment for solving equation (1.3) with (1.4) using the Cubic Bsplines collocation method with redefined basis functions is to find an approximate solution to the exact solution by eliminating and from (2.1), (2.4) and (2.5); we get the approximate solution in the form,
(2.6)
where,
(2.7)
(2.8)
Here the new set of basis functions isand they vanish on the boundary. The function defined in (2.7) takes care of Dirichlet type boundary conditions. Applying the redefined set of basis functions into equation (1.3) we get the required approximate solution.
To apply the proposed method we discretize the problem in time variable using the backward finite difference approximation and the CrankNicolson scheme to space derivatives, we get,
(2.9)
Substituting the approximate solution we have,
(2.10)
Substituting the approximate solution and its derivatives and applying boundary conditions on (2.10), it can be written in matrix form as,
(2.11)
Where,
Now and are tridiagonal matrices, which depends on boundary conditions. At each time level we solve (2.11) and recover the solution via(2.1).
3. Stability Analysis
We have established the stability analysis of the proposed method by using VonNeumann stability method [20]. For stability analysis we should consider the equation (2.10) as follows,
(3.1)
Now, it is necessary to assume that the solution of the scheme (3.1) at the mesh pointmay be written aswhere is, in general, complex, is themode number, is the element size, and . Thus using in (2.12) we obtain the characteristic equation,
(3.2)
substituting the values of ,, , , ,and from (2.11) we have,
(3.3)
(3.4)
where,
Now substitute , and in equation (3.4) we have,
(3.5)
so,
(3.6)
This implies, which is the condition for scheme to be unconditionally stable.
4. Final State
The Final vector can be determined from the Final condition which gives equations in unknowns. For the determination of the unknowns,relations at the knot are used,
The final vector is then determined as the solution of the matrix equation,
5. Option Pricing Example
In this section, we shall consider the downandout option with the exercise price and the barrier . The option becomes invalid if the asset price reaches thebarrier from above the barrier during the day of purchase and the expiration date. Unless the asset price reaches the barrier , i.e., , the option is aEuropean call option.
The value of the downandout option, denoted by is governed by the equations,
where is the current value of the underlying asset at time and is the Barrier value. The final condition on the expiration day is given by,
and the boundary conditions are as follows,
In the case of Barrier options the first boundary condition is applied at rather than . If reaches , the option is invalid, thus on the line the value of the option is zero.Now we want to price the downandout call options with , ,, and Barrier value . The analytical solution is given in [19].The comparison results with the exact solution is given in Table 1 with and .
Exact solution  Bspline solution  




























 9.24692 
As it is seen from the tabular results, the Bspline approach gave the results which are in good agreement with the exact solution. Other types of Barrier options can similarly be solved but with different Final and boundary conditions.
Notations and Symbols
T: Maturity time
E: Stike (exercise) price
X: Barrier price
S: Asset price
V: Option price
: Volatility
: Uniform mesh
U: Approximate solution
u: Exact solution
: Cubic Bspline functions
(t): Timedependent parameters
Redefined cubic Bspline functions
Mode number
h: Element size
g(x): Final condition
First boundary condition
: Last boundary condition
Grid points
References