On Natural Partial Orders of IC-Abundant Semigroups
Chunhua Li*, Baogen Xu
School of Science, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
Abstract
In this paper, we will investigate the natural partial orders on IC-abundant semigroups. After giving some properties and characterizations of natural partial orders on abundant semigroups, we consider IC-abundant semigroups. We prove that an IC-abundant semigroup is locally ample if and only if the natural partial order on the semigroup is compatible with the multiplication.
Keywords
Abundant Semigroup, Natural Partial Order, IC-Abundant Semigroup, Locally Ample
Received: March 4, 2015
Accepted: March 20, 2015
Published online: March 23, 2015
@ 2015 The Authors. Published by American Institute of Science. This Open Access article is under the CC BY-NC license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
1. Introduction
The concepts of the natural partial orders on a regular semigroup were introduced by Nambooripad [3] in 1980. As a generalization of regular semigroups in the range of abundant semigroups, El-Qallali and Fountain [1] introduced abundant semigroups. After that, various classes of abundant semigroups are researched (see, [2, 6-14] ). In 1987, Lawson defined natural partial orders on abundant semigroups, and extend Nambooripad’s results. The relation is defined on a semigroup
by the rule that
if and only if the elements
of
are related by Green’s relation
in some oversemigroup of
. The relation
is defined dually. In this paper, we shall study the natural partial orders on IC-abundant semigroups by using the notion of majorization of the relations
and
. Some properties and constructions on IC-abundant semigroups will be described in terms of its natural partial order. We shall proceed as follows: section 2 provides some known results. In section 3, we give some characterizations of the natural partial orders on abundant semigroups. The last section we consider the natural partial orders on IC-abundant semigroups.
2. Preliminaries
Throughout this paper we shall use the notions and notations of [2,4,5]. Here we provide some known results used repeatedly in the sequel. At first, we recall some basic facts about the relation and
.
Lemma II. 1 1 Let be a semigroup and
. Then the following statements are equivalent:
(1) (
);
(2) for all if and only if
As an easy but useful consequence of Lemma II.1, we have
Corollary II.1 1 Letbe a semigroup and
.Then the following statements are equivalent:
(1) (
);
(2) and for all
implies
Evidently, is a right congruence while
is a left congruence. In an arbitrary semigroup, we have
and
. But for regular elements
we get
if and only if
For convenience, we denote by
[
] a typical idempotent
related [
related ] to
(
) denotes the
class (
class ) containing
And
denotes the set of idempotents of
;
denotes the set of regular elements of
We denote by
the set of all inverses of
A semigroup is called abundant if and only if each
class and each
class contains at least one idempotent. An abundant semigroup
is called quasi-adequate if its set of idempotents constitutes a subsemigroup (i.e., its set of idempotents is a band). Moreover, a quasi-adequate semigroup is called adequate if its bands of idempotents is a semilattice (i.e., the idempotents commute). An abundant semigroup
is called ample, if for all
,
and
Follwing[1], an abundant semigroup
is called idempotent-connected, for short, IC, provided for each
and for some
, there exists a bijection
:
such that
for all
where
[resp.
] is the subsemigroup of
generated by the set
[resp.
]. In fact, an ample semigroup is an IC-adequate semigroup and vice versa. A semigroup
is called a locally P-semigroup if for all
,
is a P-semigroup. An equivalence relation
on
is called
-unipotent if each
-class of
contains exactly one idempotent. Evidently, an adequate semigroup is both
- and
- unipotent. It is well known that
- unipotent [ resp.
- unipotent ] regular semigroup is an orthdox semigroup whose band of idempotents is a right [ resp. left ] regular band ( a band
is left [resp. right] regular band if for
,
[resp.
][ see,4]).
Definition II.15 Let be an abundant semigroup. We define three relations on
, as follows:
(1) and there exists an idempotent
such that
(2) and there exists an idempotent
such that
(3) i.e.
there exist idempotents
such that
Lemma II. 2 5 Let be an abundant semigroup and
. Then
if and only if there exists
such that
and
Lemma II.3 5 Let be an abundant semigroup. Then
is IC if and only if
Definition II.2 4 Let be an equivalence relation on semigroup
,
be a subset of
is called to satisfy
- majorization if for any
and
implies that
3. Properties and Characterizations
The aim of this section is to introduce the natural partial on abundant semigroups, and to give some properties and characterizations of the natural partials on such semigroups.
PropositionIII.1 Let be an abundant semigroup and
. Then
if and only if there exist
such that
and
Proof. We only prove the sufficiency part. To see this, let such that
and
Then
Hence, by Corollary II.1,
and
Furthermore, we get
Thus
. This means that
.
LemmaIII.1 Let be an abundant semigroup. If
satisfy
- majorization, then for any
is
- unipotent.
Proof. Let Then
and
If
, then
. Since
satisfy
- majorization, we have
So,
is
- unipotent.
LemmaIII.2 Let be an abundant semigroup. If
is
- unipotent, then
satisfy
- majorization.
Proof. Let such that
and
By the dual argument of Lemma II.2, there exist
such that
Hence,
But,
is
- unipotent , we have
So,
that is,
satisfy
- majorization.
Proposition III.2 Let be an abundant semigroup. Then the following statements are equivalent:
(1) for any
is
- unipotent;
(2) for any
satisfy
- majorization;
(3) satisfy
- majorization;
(4) satisfy
- majorization.
Proof. (1)(2) It follows immediately from Lemma Ⅲ.2.
(2)(3) Suppose that (2) holds. Let
and
. Then
and
. Hence,
and so
satisfy
- majorization.
(3)(4) Assume that
satisfy
- majorization. Let
and
Then there exist
such that
On the other hand, since
is regular, we have
such that
Again, since
we have that Notice that
we get that
Similarly, we can prove that
and
Hence,
By the hypothesis,
satisfy
- majorization, we have that
Therefore,
That is,
satisfy
- majorization.
(4)(1) Assume that
satisfy
- majorization. Let
and
. Hence,
and
. By (4), we have
and so
is
- unipotent.
Theorem III. 1 Let be an abundant semigroup satisfying the regularity condition. Then the following statements are equivalent:
(1) is compatible with respect to
;
(2) is a locally adequate semigroup;
(3) for any
satisfies both
- and
-unipotent;
(4) for any
satisfies both
- and
- majorization;
(5) satisfies both
- and
- majorization;
(6) satisfies both
- and
- majorization.
Proof. (1)(2) Suppose that
is compatible with respect to
. Then
is a locally inverse semigroup (see, [3]). Noticing that for any
is an abundant semigroup, which implies that
is a semilattice and
We observe that
is a semilattice (since
is a inverse semigroup ). Thus,
is an adequate semigroup, that is,
is a locally adequate semigroup.
(2)(3) This is clear.
(3)(4)
(5)
(6) Follow from Proposition Ⅲ.2.
(6)(1) Suppose that
satisfies both
- and
- majorization. By Proposition Ⅲ.2, we have
satisfies both
- and
-unipotent. But,
we have that
is a regular semigroup satisfying both
- and
-unipotent. Furthermore,
is an inverse semigroup. Therefore,
is a locally inverse semigroup, and so
is compatible with respect to
(see,[3]).
4. Natural Partial Orders on IC-Abundant Semigroups
In this section, we will consider the natural partial orders on IC-abundant semigroups.
Theorem IV.1 Let be an IC-abundant semigroup. Then the following statements are equivalent:
(1) is right compatible with respect to
;
(2)for any and
(3)for any satisfies both
- majorization and the regularity condition;
(4) for any satisfies both
- unipotent and the regularity condition.
Proof. (1)(2) Let
and
By (1), we have that
Hence,
By Proposition 2.7 of [5], we have
Therefore,
(2)(3) Let
Then
and
By (2), we have that
Hence, which implies that
satisfies the regularity condition.
Next , we show that satisfies
- majorization.
Let such that
and
By the duality of Lemma II.2, there exist
such that
Obviously,
and
Hence,
so that
Thus
Therefore,
satisfies
- majorization.
(3)(4) It follows from Proposition III.2.
(4)(1) Suppose that (4) holds. Then
is an
- unipotent semigroup. Hence,
is a right regular band. Let
and
By Lemma II.2, for
,
there exists such that
and
Hence,
Since
by LemmaII.1, we have
It is easy to see that
Thus
since
Take
We have
and
that is,
Since is a right regular band, by assumpation, we have
Multiplying the prior formula on the right by , we obtain that
Hence,
and so,
Notice that
by the fact that
is
- unipotent, we have that
If we multiply this equality on the right by
we can obtain that
Hence,
. That is,
Note that
,
by (4), we observe
Hence,
Since
by Lemma II.2, we have
Again, since
is an IC-abundant semigroup, we get that
. The proof is completed.
Theorem IV.2 Let be an IC-abundant semigroup. Then the following statements are equivalent:
(1) is compatible with respect to
;
(2)for any and
(3) is a locally ample semigroup;
(4) for any satisfies both
- and
-majorization and the regularity condition.
Proof. It follows from Theorem IV.1 and its dual.
5. Conclusions
In this paper, we investigate the natural partial orders on IC-abundant semigroups and give some properties and characterizations of natural partial orders on abundant semigroups by using the notion of majorization. We generalize and strengthen the results of Fountain on abundant semigroups.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation (China) (No. 11261018; No. 11361024), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province ( No. 20122BAB201018 ), the Science Foundation of the Education Department of Jiangxi Province (No. GJJ14381;No. KJLD12067).
References