American Journal of Educational Science, Vol. 1, No. 4, September 2015 Publish Date: Jul. 20, 2015 Pages: 159-164

Study Attitude and Perception of Non-Tamil Students on Tamil Language: A Case Study of High School Students of Madurai District, Tamilnadu, India

Tamilenthi S.1, *, Padmini V.2, Aiswarya S.3

1St. Charles College of Education, Thirunagar, Madurai, India

2School of Chemistry, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, India

3Department of English Language Studies, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, India

Abstract

This study aims to examine student’s attitudes towards Tamil. The study used 100 students randomly selected from high schools of Madurai district through a simple random sampling technique. A questionnaire was administered to collect the data for the study. The study findings suggested that rural Non-Tamil students show significant interest in learning in Tamil in order to survive in that region. Different type of management- institution policies also helped/forced them to learn Tamil language. The students of Dravidian Language group easily accessed and learned more quickly than other language category. Hence, the local people and institutions should help them accordingly to learn Tamil in a short span of time.

Keywords

Attitude, High School, Tamil Language, Non-Tamil Students


1. Introduction

Education is to all, and it helps the nation’s development with respect to not only state, and also a country level too India has mixed culture, different language and a variety of landscapes. The easy and good road net work access, plain Terrain and government policy are attracted by other state investors and migrant workers to move towards Tamilnadu.

The long stay of the investors family and the migrant workers of Tamilnadu compelled to learn Tamil and their generations have to go educational institutions in Tamilnadu leaving their mother Language. In this context all, the students are not same in their attitude and perception in learning of Tamil language. This affects educational attainment and employment opportunity of those students. The attitude depends on the perception of the particular object, which is Tamil language here.

There are a number of research work carried out on attitude and perception, but there is no research work carried out about non-Tamil students attitude and perception in Tamilnadu, Hence, in this investigation more relevant study of other region is chosen for the generalization The present study aims to investigate the relation between student’s attitudes towards learning Tamil Language and their perception. The study carried out by the authors Schecter, Sharken, and Bayle’s (1996) claim that dual language maintenance cannot be achieved without a strong commitment on the part of the home. However, Children’s perceived levels of importance of maintaining the home language correlated with their self-perceived levels of proficiency in the language (Swathi Vanniarajan, 2008).

The School education system in Tamilnadu mainly consists of three levels, namely, primary, secondary and higher secondary. The school education is obligatory for all the children. Tamil Learning Act (2006), which passed by the Government of Tamilnadu made the study of Tamil mandatory from class/Grade I. However, the Act had clearly said that "Tamil shall be taught as a subject in Grades I to X in all schools, in a phased manner, commencing from the academic year 2006-07 for standard I, from the academic year 2007-08 for standards/Grades I and II and shall be extended up to standard/Grade X in a like manner.These Acts made compulsory to learn Tamil even the Migrants too.

The force of language policy in Tamilnadu made many migrant aspirants happened lose the reservations, this really affects the quality of education too. It is found that the mother tongue highly helps in thinking, decision making and choosing the carrier too (Times of India, 24, May, 2012).

Learning a language is based on attitude of candidate, if the candidates’ attitude is positive on particular language then he will learn sooner than negative attitude candidates (Gardner, 1985).Generally the north Indians students find difficult to learn or grasp Tamil language, whereas the southern Indian students learn bit shorter period. This variation is due to similarity with their mother tongue or their language group. The learning language occurs in different situations i.e social, Government policy or attraction of a particular culture. In general, North Indians come for business or employment opportunity they reside for a long period and tend to settle where their children easily learn Tamil language than their parents. This is due to perception on culture and Tamil language.

Reseach Problem

The students of different category study in the schools of Tamilnadu. Non-Tamil students like North Indian Hindi speaking group, other central Govt. employee’s children, South Dravidian language speaking people like Kannada speaking, and Telugu speaking are in this category. These students aspired to acquire degrees and employment opportunity and other Government employment opportunity in Tamilnadu. In this regard, the study is intended to analyze on "Study attitude and perception of Non-tamil students on Tamil language: A case study of the high school students of Madurai district, Tamilnadu, India."

The present study attempts to find answers to the following questions:

1). what attitudes do students hold towards Tamil and towards learning Tamil language ?

2). what are the ways students can improve their proficiency in Tamil language ?

3). what would be the Non-tamil students perception on Tamil subject?

4). what would the status on the part of Management type, parents income and parents educational qualification?

The following terms are used in this study and these terms are limited to this study:

Attitude: It refers to the set of beliefs that the students hold towards Tamil and their own culture as well as towards Tamil-speaking people and their culture.

Perception: It refers to a person’s basic knowledge and understanding.

2. Methodology

2.1. Study Area and Design

This study was conducted in the schools of Madurai District, Tamilnadu. Schools are owned by the Government, private management/Self finance and co-education. This study employs a quantitative descriptive research design.

2.2. Population and Sampling

The total number of 100 students from 9 &10th standard/Grade(56 males and 44 females) were randomly selected from schools (10 participants from each schools) through simple random sampling technique. The detailed profile of study participants presented below table (1).

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of respondent.

Variables N
Gender Male 56
Female 44
Locality Urban 62
Rural 38
Academic qualification of the parents Up to Higher secondary 30
Graduate 42
Post Graduate 28
Income of the parents Up to 15,000 74
Above 15000 26
Family size Up to 5 members 26
Above 5 members 74

3. Data Analysis and Results

The data obtained for the study is presented and analyzed. The data collected through the questionnaire has been presented in tabular and graphic forms. The questionnaire is divided into three sections. In section-I, Deals with demographic information: Gender, Age, Level of study, Locality, Type of management, Parents income, and Parents Educational qualification. In section -II focuses on the student’s attitudes towards learning Tamil language. In section- III examines the student’s perception on learning of Tamil language.

To analyze the data simple statistical technique is used. Descriptive statistics like mean and percentage were used to analyze demographic variables. Independent samples t-test was used. Moreover, Univariate test (one way ANOVA) was computed to examine the perception.

Hypotheses of the Study

1)  There is no significant difference between Non-Tamil students in their attitude towards Tamil language based on gender.

2)  There is no significant difference between Non-Tamil students in their attitude towards Tamil language based on locality.

3)  There is no significant difference between Non-Tamil students in their attitude towards Tamil language based on type of management.

4)  There is no significant difference between Non-Tamil students in their perception towards Tamil language based on students community.

5)  There is no significant difference between Non-Tamil students in their perception towards Tamil language based on the students parental education.

6)  There is no significant difference between Non-Tamil students in their perception towards Tamil language based on parent’s income.

3.1. Attitude Towards Tamil Based on Gender

The attitude towards Tamil is analyzed with respect to Gender. There are 56 boys and 44 girls students. The "t" test is shown in the table (2).

Table 2. Attitude towards Tamil based on gender.

S. No. Gender No. of Samples Mean Standard Deviation Calculated ‘t’ value Level of significance
1 Boys 56 66.50 5.00 0.0588 Not statistically significant.
2 Girls 44 66.67 3.98

Table 3. Attitude towards Tamil based on locality.

S.No. Locality No. of Samples Mean Standard Deviation Calculated ‘t’ value Level of significance
1 Rural 38 57.75 2.22 3.1646 Statistically significant.
2 Urban 62 49.20 4.97

The calculated ‘t’ value is not significant at 0.05 level of significance. It is concluded that the Boys and Girls do not differ in their attitude towards learning Tamil.

3.2. Attitude Towards Tamil Based on Locality

The attitude towards Tamil is analyzed with respect to locality. There are 56 boys and 44 girls students. The "t" test is shown in the table (3).

The calculated ‘t’ value is significant at 0.05 level of significance. It is concluded that the Rural and Urban differ in their attitude towards Tamil.

3.3. Attitude Towards Tamil Based on Type of School Management

The attitude towards Tamil was analyzed with respect to management. There are 56 boys and 44 girls with Govt., Private and Aided of these three (3) categories in the sample taken for study attitude is analyzed with respect to these type of management categories using one way ANOVA and it is shown in the table (4).

The ‘F’ value is significant at 0.01 level for these 3 categories of Management. That is the students of different type of management schools differ in their attitudes.

Table 4. Attitude towards Tamil based on type of management.

Sources of variations df Sum of squares MSS Calculated ‘F’ Ratio Level of significance
Between Groups 2 3531.40 1765 5.828 0.003
Within Groups 98 133601.48 302.95

3.4. Perception Towards Tamil Based on Student’s Language Categories

The Perception towards Tamil was analyzed with respect to Community. There are 56 boys and 44 girls with Indo-European, Dravidian, Mon-Khmer, and Sino-Tibetan of these 4 categories in the sample taken for study perception is analyzed with respect to these type of Language categories using one way ANOVA and it is shown in the table (5).

Table 5. Perception towards Tamil based on students Language categories.

Sources of variations df Sum of squares MSS Calculated ‘F’ Ratio Level of significance
Between Groups 3 3531.40 1765 5.828 0.003
Within Groups 97 133601.48 302.95

The ‘F’ value is significant at 0.05 level for these four (4) category of Language group. That is the students of different Language background differ in their perception.

3.5. Perception Towards Tamil Based on Their Parents Educational Qualification

The Perception towards Tamil was analyzed with respect to parents educational qualification. There are 56 boys and 44 girls with their parents qualification of up to Higher secondary, UG, PG, above PG of these 5 categories in the sample taken for study of perception is analyzed with respect to these type of community categories using one way ANOVA and it is shown in the table (6).

Table 6. Perception towards Tamil based on their parents educational qualification.

Sources of variations df Sum of squares MSS Calculated ‘F’ Ratio Level of significance
Between Groups 4 395.39 197.69 0.434 0.648
Within Groups 96 200870.60 455.48

The ‘F’ value is not significant at 0.05 level for these five (5) category of parents educational qualification background. That is the students of different qualification background of their parents do not differ in their perception.

3.6. Perception Towards Tamil Based on Parents Income

The Perception towards Tamil was analyzed with respect to parents income. There are 56 boys and 44 girls with their parents qualification of up to Rs.10,000, Rs.10,000-20,000 , above Rs.20,000 of these 3 categories in the sample taken for study perception is analyzed with respect to these type of income categories using one way ANOVA and it is shown in the table (7).

Table 7. Perception towards Tamil based on parents income.

Sources of variations df Sum of squares MSS Calculated ‘F’ Ratio Level of significance
Between Groups 2 452.45 226.22 0.730 0.483
Within Groups 98 136604.77 310

The ‘F’ value is not significant at 0.05 level for these 3 category of income group background. That is the students of different income group of their parents do not differ in their perception.

4. Discussion

The results obtained from the analysis of the table (2) reveals that the Boys and Girls do not differ in their attitude towards learning Tamil. It seems that the boys and girls of Non-Tamil students find same type of problem or perception is same.But in the same time Rural and Urban students differ in their attitude towards learning Tamil. This reveals form the table (3), that rual students show the importance of learning Tamil so as to interact with local people and get benefit of social life with mingling with local tamil community this statement agreed with (Shahila Zafar and Meenakshi. K, 2012) individual learner differences play a crucial role in the acquisition of second language.It also found table (4) that the students of different type of management schools differ in their attitudes in learning Tamil. It reveals that each school management has different policies in teaching language to make the students learn other than mother tongue. This is agreed with (Gurdial Kaur, 2008) showed that there was a wide range of views of the policy and there was a positive perception of the Non-Tamil Indian Languages policy as this was seen to be beneficial in terms of assisting students academic performance, acquisition of cultural traits and nation building.

The language group also play important role in learning a Language, as the similar language group students learn sooner than other language group students ie. South Indian student learn quickly because of similarity in the pronounciation, meaning and slang.This can identify results of table (5). Generally parents boost their student to learn language, but it may vary and depends on educational qualification of the parents. This statement is applicable in a same region or same language region people. In the table (6) reveals that the students from different qualification background parents do not differ in their perception in learning of Tamil. It means all level of educational background parents equally find the problem or feel the diffulties in learning. This also reveals that even well educated parents could not prove their effieciency in teaching or do not find the way to teach tamil for their children.

Finally the study reveals that rural Non-Tamil students show much interest on learning in Tamil in order to survive in a region where they live. Different type of institutional policies also compel them to learn local language. The students of Dravidian Language group easily aquire the skill and learn quickly than other language category language group. Hence, the local people and Institutions should help them accordingly to learn Tamil in a shorter period of time. Students must be given the choice to learn freely and at the same time student must be encouraged to participate in school activities without discrimination. The results of the study showed that Non-Tamilian learners encounter some difficulties during the language learning process.

5. Conclusion

The study concluded with following major findings with valuable suggestions to adopt/ implement as a society or in a community for the betterment of Non-tamil community who are living in Tamilndau. Nowadays the Non-Tamil students aspirant is academically better. The major finding are: 1) There is no significant difference between Non-tamil students in their attitude in learning Tamil based on gender 2) There is a significant difference between Non-tamil students in their attitude towards learning Tamil based on locality 3) There is a significant difference between Non-tamil students in their attitude towards learning Tamil based on type of school. 4) There is a significant difference between Non-tamil students in their perception towards Tamil learning based on students language group 5) There is no significant difference between Non-tamil students in their Perception towards Tamil based on the students’ parents education 6) There is no significant difference between Non-tamil students in their perception towards Tamil based on parents income.

The study reveals that rural Non-Tamil students show much interest on learning in Tamil in order to survive in a region where they live. Different type of institutional policies and also Government policy helped/forced them to learn Tamil language. The students of Dravidian Language group easily aquire the skill and learn quickly than other language category language group. Hence, the local people and Institutions should help them accordingly to learn Tamil in a shorter period of time.

Acknowledgement

The authours would like to thank Dr. K. Mohanasundaram, Principal, Government arts college (Auto), Kumbakonan, Tamilnadu, Dr. P. Arul, Associate professor of Geography, Government Arts college (Auto), Salem, Tamilnadu and Ms. T. Preethi, Grade-10, SBOA Matriculation Higher secondary school, Nagamalai Pudukottai, Madurai for their valuable help to collect the data and identifiaction of Non-Tamil students in this region.

References

  1. Ajzen, Icek. (2005) Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Great Britain: Open University Press,Mcgraw-Hill education, Mcgraw-Hill house, Berkshire, England.
  2. Al-Quyadi, A. (2000) Psycho-sociological variables in the learning of English in Yemen. Ph.D thesis, Bhagalpur University,India.
  3. Al-Tamimi, A., & Shuib Munir. (2009). Motivation and Attitudes towards Learning English: A study Of Petroleum Engineering Undergraduates at Hadhramout University of Science And Technology. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, Vol.9 (2), 29-55.
  4. Brown, H. Douglas. (2007). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, Pearson Longman, San Francisco State University,Pearson Education Inc, New York.
  5. Chapman, Elwood N. and Mcknight, Wil (2004) Attitude: Your Most Priceless Possession. India: Crisp Publications, Inc.
  6. Coleman, Brittany; McNeese, Mary Nell (2009) From Home to School: The Relationship Among Parental Involvement, Student Motivation, and Academic Achievement International Journal of Learning; 2009, Vol.16 (7), p459
  7. Fisher, D. and Koul, R.B. (2004) students’ Perception of Science learning Environment in Jammu: Attitudes and Gender Differences: Indian journal of science Communication, Vol 3(2). 16-25.
  8. Gardner, R.C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitude and motivation. Edward Arnold (publishers) Ltd, Bedford square,London.
  9. Govinda R.L., and surya Prakasham, B. (2003) parents Perception of Quality of Special Education Services in NGO’s Edutracks, Vol.2, 2003.
  10. Gurdial Kaur (2008), A Major Paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Education in the Graduate School of Education, University of Western Australia ,2008.
  11. Karahan, F. (2007). Language attitudes of Turkish students towards the English language and its use in Turkish context. Journal of Arts and Sciences Say, 7 May, 73-87.
  12. Kusum Singh monique Granville, sandra Dika (2002) Mathematics and Science Achievement: Effects of Motivation, Interest, and Academic Engagement, The Journal of educational research. July/August, 2002, Vol. 95(6), p323-332.
  13. Lafaye, B. E. & Tsuda, S. (2002). Attitudes towards English Language Learning in Higher Education in Japan, and the Place of English in Japanese Society. Intercultural Communication Studies XI: 3, PP 145-161.
  14. Roby, Douglas E(2009).Teacher perceptions of levels of professional contribution to the school. College Student Journal, Wright State University,Ohio, Volume, 43,2009.
  15. Schecter, S.R., Sharken-Taboada, D. & Bayley, R. (1996). Bilingual by Choice: Latino Parents’ Rationales and Strategies for Raising Children with Two Languages. The Bilingual Research Journal, 20(2), 261-281.
  16. Shahila Zafar and Meenakshi.K, (2012) Individual Learner Differences and Second Language Acquisition: A Review, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 639-646.
  17. Swathi Vanniarajan (2008) Tamil Language Maintenance in the Bay Area Tamil Community, San Jose State University, United States of America, Sociolinguistics Symposium 17, April 4, 2008.
  18. Suleiman, Mahmoud F. (1993) A Study of Arab Students' Motivations and Attitudes for Learning English as a Foreign Language. ERIC, ED392279. Dissertation.
  19. Tamil Nadu Tamil Learning Act (2006) A Government Order of September 18 has brought all schools under the purview of the Tamil Nadu Tamil Learning Act, 2006.
  20. Tinio, V.T. (2009). ICT in education. United Nations Development Programme. Bureau for Development Policy, New York, NY

600 ATLANTIC AVE, BOSTON,
MA 02210, USA
+001-6179630233
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - 2016 American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.