Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Vol. 1, No. 3, August 2015 Publish Date: Aug. 6, 2015 Pages: 137-143

Health Status of Textile Industry Workers: Prevalence and Socioeconomic Correlates of Different Health Problems

Zorawar Singh*

Department of Zoology, Khalsa College, Amritsar, Punjab, India


Thousands of workers are employed in textile industries under different job categories including dyeing, printing, finishing, cutting, weaving and spinning. The textile industry workers are exposed to a number of chemicals including dyes, solvents, optical brighteners, finishing agents and numerous types of natural and synthetic fibre dusts which affect their health. In this paper an attempt has been made to summarize the self-reported health problems among a group of textile industry workers. The current study was carried out in two textile based industries in Ludhiana city, Punjab, India. To assess the health problems prevailing among the workers, two questionnaires were developed. First questionnaire comprised of questions related to their demography and dietary habits. Second questionnaire was about the prevalence of different health problems among them. Data was subjected to statistical analyses for confounders. Textile industry workers were found to have an elevated risk to develop various health related problems including cough, cold, depression, headaches, sleep disturbances and skin allergies. Different health problems were also found to be positively correlated with duration of exposure, smoking, alcohol drinking, tobacco chewing and dietary pattern. The study showed that the textile industry workers exposed to dyes, solvents and fibre dusts are more prone to different health related problems. Textile workers should change their working methods and use proper protection equipments to minimize exposure to different chemicals.


Textile Industry Workers, Health Problems, Cough, Skin Allergies

1. Introduction

India is one of the leading countries in the sector of textiles and garments. In the export sector, India has overtaken many countries and has become second largest exporter in the field of textiles in the world. Textile industry has made remarkable contribution towards building national economy. It is also the second largest employment generation sector in India. This sector also attracts a huge investment from all over the world. Textile sector in India is in a strong position and is ready for more growth in the coming years both in domestic consumption as well as exports.

Textile industry in India can be divided into several segments namely cotton textiles, woollen textiles, silk textiles, readymade garments, jute, coir and hand crafted textiles [1]. All these segments need technical staff as well as daily wagers. Thus, textile industries employ lakhs of workers annually to meet their requirements. Some of the products in textile industries may include cotton yarn, blended yarn, organic cotton, modal yarn, vortex yarn, viscose yarn, acrylic yarn and acrylic-cotton yarn [1]. Making of all these products involve different degrees of exposures to different sets of substances including chemicals, dyes and solvents. Workers engaged in finishing processes are frequently exposed to crease-resistance agents. These agents may release formaldehyde which is known for its toxicity. These workers are also exposed to flame retardants including organophosphorus and organobromine compounds and antimicrobial agents. The textile industries use different kinds of dyes including the most commonly used azo dyes which are aromatic hydrocarbon derivatives of benzene, toluene, naphthalene, phenol and aniline [2]. The solvents used by the workers in different sections result in a major carcinogenic effect by direct contact with the subjects. Newhouse et al. [3] found higher mortality rates among workers engaged in bleaching and dyeing processes. Chronic occupational exposure to printing dyes and thinners may lead to a slightly increased risk of genetic damage [4]. The workers of the cutting and spinning section who work in closed environments with negligible exhaust conditions are highly exposed to fibre dust. The bad effect of fibre dust has previously been assessed by various researchers [5,6]. Thus, in textile industrial sector, the workers are having multiple exposures to different sets of chemicals and fibres. This study was conducted to collect the health related data of textile industry workers of different sectors.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Subject Selection

To conduct this study, a group of forty textile industry workers engaged in dyeing, printing, bleaching and spinning sections were selected from two textile based industries in district Ludhiana, Punjab. Both the factories were more than fifty years old. All the workers except 8 (20%) were immigrants from Bihar and Bengal who were working in the industry for several years. The textile industries selected for this study were running on full time basis without any seasonal gap and the workers were recruited on a full time basis for whole of the year. The part-time workers were excluded from the study. The workers frequently shifting in-between different types of industries were also ignored.

2.2. Questionnaire Survey

A questionnaire designed for this study was administered to the chosen textile industry workers (N = 40). The first questionnaire included questions based on dietary and smoking habits, alcohol intake, tobacco chewing and fruit intake. These parameters allowed to categorize the workers on the basis of different habits and to find out correlation among different parameters with different health related problems. An attempt was made to record a complete occupational history of each worker.

2.3. Health Related Questionnaire

A second questionnaire related to the health related problems among textile industry workers was formulated as per the reported problems. Questions about loss of appetite, skin allergies, respiratory ailments (including cough and asthmatic condition), headaches, depression, sleep disturbances, weakness, hypertension and other ailments were designed. When the questions were asked, due care was taken to avoid suggesting the associations of these ailments with the place and nature of the job to the workers. They were interviewed out of the premises of their workplace. Thus the workers responded with an independent mind without any psychological association of their health related problems with their occupation.

2.4. Questionnaire Administration

The textile industry workers were interviewed in a park very close to their workplace to avoid any psychological relation of their answers towards their occupation. They were questioned during their normal working hours. Every worker was given a code number before the interview. The interview lasted 10-15 minutes.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of Textile Industry Workers

A group of forty textile industry workers engaged in dyeing, bleaching and spinning sections were selected for the present study and were questioned for their health related problems. Mean duration of exposure for 40 workers came out to be 6.2 ± 0.8 years with a range of 1-20 years (Figure 1). Some of the workers who participated were from the second generation but were having low duration of exposures. The workers had a varied economic status (Figure 2) with a salary range of Rs. 4500-18000 (Mean ± SE; 7500 ± 476). According to the dietary habits, 22 workers were found to be non-vegetarians whereas 18 were vegetarians.

Table 1. Characteristics of textile industry workers (N = 40).

Character Subject group N Percentage
Diet Vegetarians 18 45%
Non- vegetarians 22 55%
Alcohol drinking Drinkers 11 27.5%
Non-drinkers 29 72.5%
Smoking Smokers 12 30%
Non-smokers 28 70%
Tobacco chewing Chewers 08 20%
Non-chewers 32 80%
Fruit intake Adequate 10 25%
Moderate 27 67.5%
Inadequate 03 7.5%

Workers were categorized into three different categories based on their habits of smoking, alcohol intake and tobacco use. The workers who used to smoke even a single beedi or cigarette per day were considered as smokers. Workers taking minimum of 30ml alcohol per day were considered as drinkers. Under this criteria, 12 subjects (30%) were found out to be smokers and 28 (70%) were categorized as non-smokers whereas 11 (27.5%) were drinkers and 29 (72.5%) were found to be non-drinkers. In case of tobacco chewing, 8 workers (20%) were identified as tobacco chewers whereas 32 workers (80%) were not using tobacco in any form (Table 1, Figure 3). Only 25% (N = 10) workers were found to be taking fruits in an adequate amount required by a normal human body whereas 67.5% (N = 27) workers were found to be taking fruits in a moderate amount. 7.5% workers were found to be taking fruits in a very less amount (N = 3).

Figure 1. Frequency of duration of exposure among textile industry workers.

Table 2. Overall responses for different health problems (N = 17) among different groups of textile industry workers with respect to different habits.

Character Group N Overall responses Percentage
Diet Vegetarians 18 58 39.18%
Non- vegetarians 22 90 60.81%
Alcohol drinking Drinkers 11 34 22.97%
Non-drinkers 29 114 77.02%
Smoking Smokers 12 40 27.02%
Non-smokers 28 108 72.97%
Tobacco chewing Chewers 08 32 21.62%
Non-chewers 32 116 78.37%
Fruit intake Adequate 10 37 25.00%
Moderate 27 18 12.16%
Inadequate 03 93 62.83%

3.2. Health Related Problems

In the present study a group of 40 workers was questioned for their health related problems. Table 2 shows the overall response of the workers to all the 17 health related problems. A total of 148 positive responses were recorded from the group, out of which 58 and 90 responses for different health problems were from workers on the basis of dietary habits viz. vegetarians and non-vegetarians. Whereas 34 and 114 responses were from drinker and non-drinker groups. 40 and 108 overall responses were recorded for smokers and non-smokers. 32 positive responses were given by tobacco chewers whereas 116 positive responses were by workers who were not using tobacco.

Figure 2. Frequency of salary per month among textile industry workers.

Similarly 37, 18 and 93 positive responses were recorded for adequate, moderate and inadequate fruit intaking groups respectively. There can be a direct relation of economic status (salary per month) with diet intake. A good diet can include more nutritious items and fruits which are rich in antioxidants. For this reason correlation between salary and fruit intake was found. Pearson correlation value for this test came out to be R = 0.039 (p = 0.812). Thus no such expected relation between economic status and fruit intake was found. However a significant correlation between duration of exposure (DOE) and economic status (Salary per month) was found (R = 0.345; p = 0.029). Figure 4 shows the correlation between DOE and salary as the peaks keep on increasing towards the salary as the duration of working increases in the industry. Average responses were calculated for the number of subjects in each category made with respect to duration of exposure (Figure 5). Exposure group of 11-15 years was found to have maximum average response for all the assessed health related problems whereas the exposure group of 6-10 years was found to have the minimum average responses (Figure 5).

Figure 3. Categorization of textile industry workers with respect to smoking, drinking and chewing habits. S, Smoker; NS, Non-smoker; A, Drinker; NA, Non-drinker; T, Tobacco chewer; NT, Non-chewer.

Figure 4. Surface plot showing the relation of salary per month (in rupees) with duration of working in the industry (experience). [R = 0.345; p = 0.029].

Figure 5. Overall average response for all the 17 health parameters assessed with respect to different exposure groups. Linear forecast trendline shows the increasing trend over the next two exposure groups.

The most frequent health problem among workers came out to be headache (27 responses out of 40). The second most prevalent problem was found out to be cough (19 responses). Then came depression during the working hours (18 responses). With 18 responses, dryness of mouth stood parallel to depression as per the score counts. All the health related problems with their response frequency has been given in the figure 6.

There were several health related problems including loss of appetite (LA), fatigue (FT), nausea (NS) and diabetes (DB) which scored a zero in the questionnaire round (zero responses). All the health problems were found for their individual correlation with confounding factors including DOE, alcohol drinking, tobacco chewing, smoking, non-vegetarian diet and fruit intake (Table 3). Dryness of mouth (MD), depression (DP), asthma (AS) and sleep disturbances (SD) were found to have a positive correlation with duration of exposure (p = 0.006, 0.009, 0.000 and 0.029 respectively). Similarly, asthma (AS) and weakness (WK) were found to be positively correlated with alcohol intake (p = 0.007 and 0.022). Skin problems were found to be associated with tobacco chewing (R = 0.315; p = 0.048). A significant positive correlation was found between asthma (AS) and smoking (R = 0.378; p = 0.016). Memory loss has been found to be correlated with the diet pattern (R = 0.302) but the correlation failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.059).

Table 3. Correlation between factors and health related problems (Pearson Correlation, R values).

Factors DOE Alcohol Tobacco Smoking Diet Fruit intake
HA -0.260 -0.170 0.214 -0.128 0.016 -0.170
MD -0.428* -0.219 0.050 -0.044 0.212 -0.107
DP -0.407* -0.219 0.050 -0.154 0.111 -0.199
AS 0.588* 0.420* 0.000 0.378* 0.174 0.133
WK -0.155 -0.361* -0.000 -0.056 0.182 0.131
HBP 0.113 0.158 -0.066 -0.158 -0.245 0.094
DB 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NS 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
SP -0.199 -0.102 0.315* -0.275 0.099 -0.135
EI 0.181 -0.063 0.000 0.247 -0.114 0.017
FT 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
WL 0.197 0.037 -0.142 0.228 0.067 0.258
LA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
CG -0.283 0.087 0.150 -0.186 -0.045 -0.215
SD -0.345* -0.130 0.129 -0.169 0.078 -0.250
ML 0.045 -0.205 -0.167 -0.036 0.302* -0.108
AM -0.135 -0.141 -0.115 -0.150 0.208 -0.074

*p<0.05; HA, Headache; MD, Dryness of mouth; DP, Depression; AS, Asthma; WK, Weakness; HBP, High blood pressure, Hypertension; DB, Diabetes; NS, Nausea; SP, Skin problems; EI, Eye irritations; FT, Fatigue; WL, Weight loss; LA, Loss of appetite; CG, Cough; SD, Sleep disturbances; ML, Memory loss; AM, Anemia.

4. Discussion

Textile industry is one of the leading economic sectors in India. Textile sector has generated millions of job opportunities all over the world. In Punjab, thousands of workers are employed in textile industries every year. Besides pushing the industries to new heights, the workers are contributing a lot in the overall growth of this sector at national level. But, these workers are exposed to a number of chemicals including dyes, solvents and finishers. Many of the researchers have studied the workers of cotton industry [7-20]regarding the respiratory health related problems and found high prevalence of cough and colds among workers of cotton industry. As these workers are exposed to a high amount of fibre dusts of different nature depending upon the type of fibre used, they suffer from various respiratory ailments. In the present study 19 workers were found to be suffering from frequent cough throughout the year. 10 cases were recorded for the condition of asthma. The fibre dust may contain fibres of different lengths which have different health implications.

Textile fibre dusts are known for their health effects including cancer. Factors that can alter the biological activity of fibres are fibre dimensions, chemical composition and their surface properties. The clearance of fibres in the lungs depends upon the length of fibres. Fibres longer than 8µm are trapped at the mesothelial lining [21]. Thus long fibres, regardless of their composition, are more effective in producing mesotheliomas than shorter fibres [22]. The presence of Mg2+­ ions on the fibres is an important factor in producing cytotoxic and carcinogenic effects [23]. The chemicals used in textile industry and fibre dusts are also known for producing oxidative stress among textile industry workers. Oxidative stress is the imbalance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the ability of the biological system to detoxify these reactive moieties [24]. Fe2+ and Fe3+ content in the fibres can catalyze Fenton reactions, generating a huge number of reactive oxygen species which are potentially mutagenic [25,26]. Asbestos fibres have been shown to generate both reactive oxygen and nitrogen reactive species (ROS/RNS) causing oxidation and nitrosylation of DNA [27].

Figure 6. Frequency of different health related problems among textile industry workers (N = 40). HA, Headache; CG, Cough; DP, Depression; MD, Dryness of mouth; SD, Sleep disturbances; WK, Weakness; AS, Asthma; HBP, High blood pressure, Hypertension; SP, Skin problems; EI, Eye irritations; ML, Memory loss; WL, Weight loss; AM, Anemia; LA, Loss of appetite, FT, Fatigue; NS, Nausea; DB, Diabetes.

As the experience of the worker in the textile industry increases, he is given more sophisticated and technical work. It has been seen that salary of the worker is increased with experience. According to the questionnaire, it was found that the reported salaries were significantly increased according to their experience. Figure 4 shows the correlation of salary per month with the duration of exposure or experience. It is believed that with increasing salary, one can enrich his diet by taking more fruits. As fruits are rich in antioxidants, these may help in overcoming the effects of different chemicals to which the workers are exposed while working. But there was a non-significant correlation found between salary per month and fruit intake (R = 0.039; p = 0.812). Thus fruit intake by the workers was not found to be affected by their salaries.

The use of dyes and solvents in the textile industry are the main toxic substances used. Different types of dyes used in the textile industries pose a toxic effect [28-32]. Many of the researchers have used different test dyes used in textile industries to evaluate their toxicity [33-41]. Different models have also been used including fish [42,43], frog [44], pottery painters [45], Drosophila [46] and Daphnia [47]. As textile industry workers in the present study were exposed to different dyes and solvents, effect of exposure was assessed on the self-reported health related problems among textile workers. Workers (N = 40) were divided into four groups with respect to the duration of exposure viz. 1-5 years, 6-10 years, 11-15 years and 16-20 years. Maximum workers fall into the first exposure group of 1-5 years (N = 20). Rest of the groups were having 13, 05 and 03 workers respectively. A total of 148 positive responses were recorded on administration of the questionnaire among these four exposure groups with 68, 41, 31 and 08 responses per group respectively. Overall average response was found for each exposure group. Maximum average response was found to be highest in the group of 11-15 years. The minimum was found to be in the exposure group 6-10 years. It was found that dirty and tedious work was given to the newly joined workers in the industry. Thus the first exposure group (1-5 years) was having higher average responses for health related problems. Highly experienced workers (exposure group 16-20 years) were given administrative jobs, thus having less chemical and fibre exposure. Their average response was found to be less than expected. Figure 5 shows the increasing average response among four exposure groups. Linear forecast trendline predicts the increasing trend upto the next two exposure group levels.

Correlations for self-reported 17 health related problems were found with different confounding factors including duration of exposure, alcohol intake, tobacco chewing, smoking, non-vegetarian diet and fruit intake. Out of all the factors, duration of exposure (DOE) was found in positive correlation with a maximum of four health related problems. Dryness of mouth (MD), depression (DP), asthma (AS) and sleep disturbances (SD) were found to have a positive correlation with duration of exposure (p = 0.006, 0.009, 0.000 and 0.029 respectively). Two health problems (asthma and weakness) were found to be associated with alcohol intake. Skin problems, asthma and memory loss were found to be associated with tobacco chewing, smoking and diet respectively. Skin problems have also been previously reported in cotton industry [18,19]. Rest of the problems reported by the workers were not found to be associated with any of the 6 factors, thus are predicted to be due to the exposure of the workers to different sets of chemicals and fibres only. Thus occupational exposures to dyes, solvents, finishing and bleaching agents, and fibre dusts are harmful for the workers engaged in the textile industries. The workers should improve their working methods or they should use proper protection equipments for decreasing the magnitude of their exposure to the chemicals being used.

5. Conclusion

Thousands of workers are employed annually in the textile sector to meet the demands of country. But the workers engaged in different sections of the textile industry are exposed to different sets of known and unknown compounds produced as a result of different industrial processes which are responsible for various health related problems in textile industry workers. The present study confirmed that textile industry workers are more prone to develop different health related ailments due their occupational environments. Conclusively, textile industry workers must change their work-style and should use proper protection equipments to minimize the effect of the chemicals being used in the textile industry.


The author thanks Dr. Sunita Bhalla, Head, Department of Fashion Technology, S.D. College, Jalandhar for her help in the survey for the present study.


  1. CCI Corporate Catalyst India. A brief report on textile industry in India. 2014: 1-13.
  2. Ragunathan I, Palanikumar L, Panneerselvam N. Cytogenetic studies on the peripheral lymphocytes of occupationally exposed textile dye industry workers. Med Bio 2007; 43-46.
  3. Newhouse ML: Mortality study of bleachers and dyers. Ann Occup Hyg 1978;21: 293-296.
  4. Aksoy H, Yilmaz S, Celik M, Yuzbasioglu D, Unal F. Genotoxicity study in lymphocytes of offset printing workers. J Appl Toxicol 2006;26: 10-15.
  5. Abdel Kader MM, Emara AM, Kamel G, Habib A, el-Samra GH, Abdel-Halim S. Chemico-pathological changes in the liver of industrial workers chronically exposed to cotton dust. J Egypt Med Assoc 1971;54: 489-501.
  6. Haworth E, Macdonald AD. On histamine in cotton dust, and in the blood of cotton workers. J Hyg (Lond) 1937;37: 234-242.
  7. Laciak J. Effect of cotton dust on paranasal sinuses in workers of cotton plants. Med Pr 1954;5: 371-378.
  8. Chaari N, Amri C, Khalfallah T, Alaya A, Abdallah B, Harzallah L, Henchi MA, Bchir N, Kamel A, Akrout M. Rhinitis and asthma related to cotton dust exposure in apprentices in the clothing industry. Rev Mal Respir 2009;26: 29-36.
  9. Rastogi SK, Gupta BN, Mathur N, Husain T. A study of the prevalence of ventilatory obstruction in textile workers exposed to cotton dust. Environ Res 1989;50: 56-67.
  10. Thind GS. Acute pulmonary alveolar proteinosis due to exposure to cotton dust. Lung India 2009;26: 152-154.
  11. Su YM, Su JR, Sheu JY, Loh CH, Liou SH. Additive effect of smoking and cotton dust exposure on respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function of cotton textile workers. Ind Health 2003;41: 109-115.
  12. Parikh JR, Venkatakrishna-Bhatt H, Panchal GM. Blood histamine levels in cotton-dust exposed workers in a textile mill of Ahmedabad. Am J Ind Med 1987;12: 439-443.
  13. Kennedy SM, Christiani DC, Eisen EA, Wegman DH, Greaves IA, Olenchock SA, Ye TT, Lu PL. Cotton dust and endotoxin exposure-response relationships in cotton textile workers. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;135: 194-200.
  14. Levin LI, Gao YT, Blot WJ, Zheng W, Fraumeni JF, Jr..Decreased risk of lung cancer in the cotton textile industry of Shanghai. Cancer Res 1987;47: 5777-5781.
  15. Rylander R. Health effects of cotton dust exposures. Am J Ind Med 1990;17: 39-45.
  16. Checkoway H, Ray RM, Lundin JI, Astrakianakis G, Seixas NS, Camp JE, Wernli KJ, Fitzgibbons ED, Li W, Feng Z, Gao DL, Thomas DB. Lung cancer and occupational exposures other than cotton dust and endotoxin among women textile workers in Shanghai, China. Occup Environ Med 2011;68: 425-429.
  17. McElvenny DM, Hurley MA, Lenters V, Heederik D, Wilkinson S, Coggon D. Lung cancer mortality in a cohort of UK cotton workers: an extended follow-up. Br J Cancer 2011;105: 1054-1060.
  18. Tahir MW, Mumtaz MW, Tauseef S, Sajjad M, Nazeer A, Farheen N, Iqbal M. Monitoring of cotton dust and health risk assessment in small-scale weaving industry. Environ Monit Assess 2012;184: 4879-4888.
  19. Bakirci N, Kalaca S, Francis H, Fletcher AM, Pickering CA, Tumerdem N, Cali S, Oldham L, Niven R. Natural history and risk factors of early respiratory responses to exposure to cotton dust in newly exposed workers. J Occup Environ Med 2007;49: 853-861.
  20. Schachter EN, Kapp MC, Beck GJ, Maunder LR, Witek TJ. Smoking and cotton dust effects in cotton textile workers. Chest 1989;95: 997-1003.
  21. Moalli PA, MacDonald JL, Goodglick LA, Kane AB.Acute injury and regeneration of the mesothelium in response to asbestos fibers. Am J Pathol 1987;128: 4426–445.
  22. Stanton GB, Cruce WLR, Goldberg ME, Robinson DL. Some ipsilateral projections to area PF and PG of the inferior parietal lobule in monkeys. Neurosci Lett 1977;6: 243-50.
  23. Singh Z, Chadha P. Genotoxic effect of fibre dust among textile industry workers. J Env Sci Sust 2013;1: 81-84.
  24. Singh Z, Karthigesu IP, Singh P, Kaur R. Use of malondialdehyde as a biomarker for assessing oxidative stress in different disease pathologies: a review. Iranian J Pub Health 2014;43: 7-16.
  25. Weitzman S, Graceffa P. Asbestos catalyzes hydroxyl and superoxide radical generation from hydrogen peroxide. Arch Biochem Biophysics 1984;228: 373-376.
  26. Zalma R, Bonneau L, Jaurand CM, Guignard J, Pezerat H. Canadian J Chem 1987;65: 2338-2341.
  27. Shukla A, Gulumian M, Hei TK, Kamp D, Rahman Q, Mossman BT. Multiple roles of oxidants in the pathogenesis of asbestos-induced diseases. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2003;34: 1117-1129.
  28. Donbak L, Rencuzogullari E, Topaktas M, Sahin G. A biomonitoring study on the workers from textile dyeing plants. Genetika 2006; 42(6): 757-762.
  29. Przybojewska B, Baranski B, Spiechowicz E, Szymczak W. Mutagenic and genotoxic activity of chosen dyes and surface active compounds used in the textile industry. Pol J Occup Med 1989; 2(2): 171-185.
  30. Wollin KM, Gorlitz BD. Comparison of genotoxicity of textile dyestuffs in Salmonella mutagenicity assay, in vitro micronucleus assay, and single cell gel/comet assay. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 2004; 23(4): 267-278.
  31. Tsuboy MS, Angeli JP, Mantovani MS, Knasmuller S, Umbuzeiro GA, Ribeiro LR.Genotoxic, mutagenic and cytotoxic effects of the commercial dye CI Disperse Blue 291 in the human hepatic cell line HepG2. Toxicol In Vitro 2007; 21(8): 1650-1655.
  32. Thun MJ, Altekruse SF, Namboodiri MM, Calle EE, Myers DG, Heath CW, Jr. Hair dye use and risk of fatal cancers in U.S. women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86(3): 210-215.
  33. Bakshi DK, Sharma P. Genotoxicity of textile dyes evaluated with Ames test and rec-assay. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 2003; 22(2): 101-109.
  34. Carita R, Marin-Morales MA.Induction of chromosome aberrations in the Allium cepa test system caused by the exposure of seeds to industrial effluents contaminated with azo dyes. Chemosphere 2008; 72(5): 722-725.
  35. Choudhary E, Capalash N, Sharma P. Genotoxicity of degradation products of textile dyes evaluated with rec-assay after PhotoFenton and ligninase treatment. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 2004; 23(4): 279-285.
  36. El-Rahim WM, Khalil WK, Eshak MG. Genotoxicity studies on the removal of a direct textile dye by a fungal strain, in vivo, using micronucleus and RAPD-PCR techniques on male rats. J Appl Toxicol 2008; 28(4): 484-490.
  37. Kornbrust D, Barfknecht T. Testing of 24 food, drug, cosmetic, and fabric dyes in the in vitro and the in vivo/in vitro rat hepatocyte primary culture/DNA repair assays. Environ Mutagen 1985; 7(1): 101-120.
  38. Lin GH, Brusick DJ. Mutagenicity studies on two triphenylmethane dyes, bromophenol blue and tetrabromophenol blue. J Appl Toxicol 1992; 12(4): 267-274.
  39. Mathur N, Bhatnagar P, Nagar P, Bijarnia MK. Mutagenicity assessment of effluents from textile/dye industries of Sanganer, Jaipur (India): a case study. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2005; 61(1): 105-113.
  40. Oliveira GA, Ferraz ER, Chequer FM, Grando MD, Angeli JP, Tsuboy MS et al.Chlorination treatment of aqueous samples reduces, but does not eliminate, the mutagenic effect of the azo dyes Disperse Red 1, Disperse Red 13 and Disperse Orange 1. Mutat Res 2010; 703(2): 200-208.
  41. Przybojewska B, Baranski B, Spiechowicz E, Sitarek K. Mutagenic activity of some textile dyes in different test systems. Toxicol Lett 1988; 40(2): 183-192.
  42. Al-Sabti K. Chlorotriazine reactive Azo red 120 textile dye induces micronuclei in fish.Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2000; 47(2): 149-155.
  43. Sumathi M, Kalaiselvi K, Palanivel M, Rajaguru P. Genotoxicity of textile dye effluent on fish (Cyprinus carpio) measured using the comet assay. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2001; 66(3): 407-414.
  44. Birhanli A, Ozmen M. Evaluation of the toxicity and teratogenity of six commercial textile dyes using the frog embryo teratogenesis assay-Xenopus. Drug Chem Toxicol 2005; 28(1): 51-65.
  45. Christensen JM, Poulsen OM. A 1982-1992 surveillance programme on Danish pottery painters. Biological levels and health effects following exposure to soluble or insoluble cobalt compounds in cobalt blue dyes. Sci Total Environ 1994; 150(1-3): 95-104.
  46. Dogan EE, Yesilada E, Ozata L, Yologlu S. Genotoxicity testing of four textile dyes in two crosses of Drosophila using wing somatic mutation and recombination test. Drug Chem Toxicol 2005; 28(3): 289-301.
  47. Ferraz ER, Grando MD, Oliveira DP.The azo dye Disperse Orange 1 induces DNA damage and cytotoxic effects but does not cause ecotoxic effects in Daphnia similis and Vibrio fischeri. J Hazard Mater 2011; 192(2): 628-633.

MA 02210, USA
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - 2016 American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.