Journal of Environment Protection and Sustainable Development, Vol. 1, No. 2, May 2015 Publish Date: May 18, 2015 Pages: 81-85

Direct and Residual Effects of Sulphur from Organic Manures and Single Super Phosphate Integration on Microbial Activity in Groundnut – Sunflower Cropping System

P. Premanandarajah*, W. Shanika

Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Eastern University, Chenkalady, Sri Lanka

Abstract

Potculture experiments were conducted using different sulphur sources to improve organic carbon content and to maintain a better microbial population in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) sunflower (Helianthus annuus) cropping system. Four organic sources (farmyard manure, poultry manure, vermicompost and sewage sludge) evaluated in comparison with the standard inorganic source of single superphosphate, all applied on equal S basis at 75 kg S ha-1. The six treatments, including a no-S (control) were replicated four times in a completely randomized design. The main crop of groundnut was followed by the residual crop of sunflower.  Post-harvest soil analysis was carried out after groundnut and sunflower. Organic manures increased the organic carbon content, biomass carbon content and microbial population. Poultry manure increased the microbial population and biomass carbon content. However, the microbial biomass carbon content in the post-residual crop soil was lower than that in the post-harvest soil after first crop.

Keywords

Organic Carbon, Biomass Carbon, Sulphur Source, Organic Manure, Microbial Population


1. Introduction

Oilseeds and their derivatives vegetable oil and meal are in demand globally, and there is a need to identify and quantify the key issues for their production for different stakeholders to develop and support actions that will ensure a viable future of such crops (Muhammad Farhan et al., 2013). In oil seeds sulphur plays a vital role in the development of seed and improving the quality (Naser et al., 2012).

Although inorganic fertilization is very important for the healthy plant growth, soil fertility cannot be maintained with the application of inorganic fertilizers alone. Besides inorganic chemical fertilizers, there are several sources of plant nutrients like organic manures, crop residues, and industrial wastes. No single source can meet the increasing nutrient demands for agriculture. Soil organic matter is considered nature’s signature of a productive soil. Organic carbon from manure provides the energy source for the active healthy soil microbial environment that both stabilizes nutrient sources and makes those nutrients available to crops. Subrahmaniyan et al. (1999) observed that soil organic C changed significantly with the addition of organic manures after a three-year period, but not with inorganic fertilization, in a groundnut-based cropping system.

The organic source of nutrients have the advantage of consistent and slow release of nutrients, maintaining ideal C:N ratio, improvement in water holding capacity and microbial biomass of soil, without any adverse residual effects (Yadav et al., 2010). In addition to that soil organic matter is the primary source of plant-available SO4 -S in surface soil. Therefore to achieve sustainability in oil seed production there is a need to integrate both organic and inorganic sources of nutrients. Deshmukh et al. (2005) reported that if integrated nutrient management system is adopted, then higher levels of nutrient uptake by plant as well as its availability in soil could be maintained even after harvest of the crop.

2. Materials and Methods

The soil used in the present study was loamy sand and the organic carbon content was 6.3 %. The processed soil samples were filled in earthen pots at the rate of 8 kg soil per pot. There were four organic sources (farmyard manure, poultry manure, vermicompost and sewage sludge) evaluated in comparison with the standard inorganic source of single superphosphate, all applied on equal S basis at the rate of 75 kg S ha-1. The six treatments, including no-sulphur (control) were replicated four times in a completely randomized design making a total of 24 pots.

Seeds of groundnut (five per pot) were sown in each pot. To all the pots, common basal applications of urea, muriate of potash and gypsum were given. Routine cultural practices were adopted in raising the crop. After the harvest of main crop groundnut, the soil in the pots were removed, gently powdered and repotted again. Common basal applications of urea and muriate of potash were given; no sulphur was applied. Seeds of sunflower were then sown in each pot. Routine cultural practices were followed in raising the crop. Post-harvest soil analysis for organic carbon content, biomass carbon content and microbial population viz. bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes were carried out after groundnut and sunflower.

3. Statistical Analysis

The data obtained from the above investigations were subjected to statistical analysis following the methods to find out the effect of various treatments on organic carbon content, biomass carbon content and microbial population in soil after groundnut and sunflower (Panse and Sukhatme, 1967).

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Main Crop (Groundnut)

4.1.1. Soil Organic Carbon Content

Application of sulphur significantly altered the organic carbon status of post-harvest soil. Maximum organic carbon content was observed under farmyard manure application (6.9 g kg-1). Vermicompost was the next best source that increased the soil organic carbon content to 6.5 g kg-1. The organic carbon content in superphosphate was the lowest among the sulphur sources (5.2 g kg-1) and in control the value registered was 4.2 g kg-1.

The increase in organic carbon content of the soil in the fertilized plot is probably due to enhanced root growth leading to accumulation of more organic residues in the soil. This may be due to the vegetative growth and yield attributes by the better supply of nutrient through sulphur application over control. The application of sulphur increased the chlorophyll formation, which enhances the formation of photosynthesis resulting in an increase in plant attributes in green gram (Singh and Sharma, 1997). The application of sulphur had positive effect on biomass accumulation (Daniela et al., 2008). This might be the reason for higher organic carbon content in sulphur treated plots.

Among treatments, in manurial treatment organic carbon content was higher than chemical treatment. It might be due to the addition of organic manure, which stimulated the growth and activity of microorganism, and also due to better root growth. These observations are in line with the finding of Malik et al. (2013).

Table 1. Effect of Sulphur sources on post-harvest soil nutrient availability.

Sulphur sources Organic C (%)
Control 4.2d
Farmyard manure 6.9a
Poultry manure 6.2ab
Vermicompost 6.5ab
Sewage sludge 6.1b
Superphosphate 5.2c
P value < 0.05

4.1.2. Microbial Population and Biomass Carbon

i.    Microbial Population

Addition of sulphur through different organic sources increased the microbial population in the post-harvest soil after the harvest of groundnut.  The maximum population of bacteria (33 cfu x 106 g-1), fungi (12 cfu x 104 g-1) and Actinomycetes (30.1 cfu x 103 g-1) were observed in the treatment that received poultry manure, vermicompost and poultry manure, respectively. The population of bacteria, fungi and Actinomycetes in chemical fertilizer treatment was lower (17 cfu x 106 g-1, 5.7 cfu x 104 g-1 and 16 cfu x 103 g-1 respectively) than the organic manure treatments.

The attributed reason could be due to enhanced organic carbon content of the soil as a result of organic manure application as compared to inorganic fertilizer. Besides this organic manure addition might have helped to increase the micronutrients and secondary nutrients in the soil. This might have helped to increase the microbial population (Krishnakumar et al., 2007). In the present investigation, it was observed that poultry manure increased the bacterial and fungal population. Soil bacteria, CO2 evolution and enzymatic activities like amylase, invertase and dehydrogenase were also found higher in poultry dung amended soil. Lakshmikanti and Pramod (2012) supported the effectiveness of poultry dung in enhancing soil productivity.

The high organic carbon content in soil applied with poultry manure might have stimulated the microorganisms by serving as source of carbon, energy and other nutrients essential for their growth and multiplication, and thus increased the soil activities. Similar results of increased enzyme activity due to poultry manure application have been reported by Boomiraj (2003) in bhendi.

ii.   Biomass carbon

The soil biomass carbon content was significantly influenced by the different treatments imposed. Among the treatments, poultry manure (302 mg kg-1) and vermicompost (300 mg kg-1) treatments increased significantly the biomass carbon more than any other treatment. This was followed by farmyard manure and swage treatments (244 and 242 mg kg-1, respectively). Inorganic fertilizer treatment recorded the lowest value among the sulphur sources which was significantly higher than control.

The increase in microbial biomass due to addition of organic residues might be due to the availability of higher amounts of mineralizable nitrogen and carbon. Dinesh Kumar et al. (2007) confirmed that the amendment of soil with organic residues increased the microbial biomass carbon. Among organic manures poultry manure increased the content as it is the rich source of nutrients.

Table 2. Effect of sulphur source on microbial population and biomass carbon content.

Sulphur Source Biomass carbon (mg kg-1) Bacteria (cfu x 106g-1) Fungi (cfu x 104g-1) Actinomycetes (cfu x 103g-1)
Control 167c 11.0d 4.0c 12.0c
Farmyard manure 244b 24.6b 9.0b 21.0b
Poultry manure 302a 33.0a 11.0ab 30.1a
Vermicompost 300a 29.0ab 12.0a 30.0 a
Sewage sludge 242b 25.0b 8.0b 21.0b
Superphosphate 178c 17.0c 5.7c 16.0c
P value < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

4.2.Residual Crop (Sunflower)

4.2.1 Soil Organic Carbon Content

The results revealed that post-harvest soil organic carbon content was significantly influenced by the treatments imposed. Poultry manure registered the highest soil organic carbon (5.0 g kg-1) in post-harvest soil after residual crop and was on par with sewage sludge. The organic content in superphosphate was the lowest among the sulphur sources. The value registered in control was 2.0 gkg-1.

Table 3. Effect of sulphur source on post-harvest soil nutrient availability.

Sulphur sources Organic C (%)
Control 2d
Farmyard manure 4b
Poultry manure 5a
Vermicompost 4b
Sewage sludge 5a
Superphosphate 3c
P value < 0.05

Residual organic carbon content was higher in organic manure treated soils than in chemical fertilizer treated soils and in control. Slow mineralization of organic matter might lead to the buildup of organic carbon (Yadav et al., 2003).

4.2.2. Microbial Population and Biomass Carbon

i.    Microbial population

As in the case of microbial population in the soil after the harvest of main crop of groundnut, an identical trend was observed to be similar in microbial population in the soil after the harvest of residual crop of sunflower. The population was lowest in the residual crop soil than in the post-harvest soil after first crop. The bacterial fungi and Actinomycetes population was ranged from 12 – 29 cfu x 106 g-1, 3 -11 cfu x 104 g-1 and 11- 27 cfu x 103 g-1 respectively.

Increased population of microorganisms was observed in the treatments that received organic manures. Higher population of microbes under organic treatments acted as an index of soil fertility because it serves as temporary sink of nutrients flux as observed by Hassink et al. (1991).

The lowest microbial load was due to inorganic fertilizers which might be due to the inhibitory nature of chemical fertilizers on the growth and development of microbes. Yadav and Christopher (2007) confirmed that poultry manure addition to rice increased the bacteria, fungi and Actinomycetes population as well as dehydrogenase, urease, and phosphatase activities.

But the population was lower than in soil after first crop. The initial high microbial population might be due to the high availability of nutrients released during the decomposition of the organic residues by the action of microbial enzymes such as protease, cellulose, amylase, phosphatase and urease. This was supported by Nur et al. (2009) that the Soil organic C and soil microbial biomass, protease, urease, alkaline phosphatase, and dehydrogenase activity were significantly higher in the organic system than in the conventional system.

ii.   Biomass carbon

The microbial biomass was higher in organic manure treated plots and was followed the trend that was reported earlier in the post-harvest soil after the main crop of groundnut. This was probably due to higher availability of substrate as carbon from applied organic manures, intense rooting activity and better soil water status. Increased availability of water-soluble carbon and nutrients might stimulate microbial growth (Patra et al., 1992).

In residual crop the increase in biomass carbon content than control indicates that in addition to the organic matter supplied through organic sources the organic exudates from growing roots and ground roots of previous crop (groundnut). This was confirmed by Rasse et al. (2005).

Table 4. Effect of sulphur source on microbial population and biomass carbon content.

Sulphur source Biomass carbon (mg kg-1) Bacteria (cfu x 106g-1) Fungi (cfu x 104g-1) Actinomycetes (cfu x 103g-1)
Control 121d 12.0e 3.0d 11.0c
Farmyard manure 213b 19.0c 7.0b 18.0b
Poultry manure 288a 29.0a 10.0a 27.0a
Vermicompost 275a 26.0b 11.0a 27.0a
Sewage sludge 207b 19.0c 7.0b 19.0b
Superphosphate 153c 15.0d 5.0c 14.0c
P value < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

5. Conclusion

Biomass carbon content was higher in organic manure treated soil than in control but, it was lower in residual soil than the post-harvest soil after first crop. Among the sulphur sources poultry manure exhibited the greatest influence. The microbial population and organic carbon content was also higher in poultry manure treated soil. Among the sulphur sources tried, poultry manure was the best source in increasing post- harvest soil microbial population and biomass carbon content in main and residual crop.

Future Suggestions

·    Influence of the treatments on the yield and quality of groundnut and sunflower.

·    Impact of the integration on soil fertility and health.

·    Field trials to ensure the performance of these treatments.

References

  1. Bhattacharya, P. Chakrabarti, K., Chakraborty, A. and Bhattacharya, B. 2001. Microbial biomass and activities of soils amended with municipal solid waste compost. J. Indian. Soc. Soil. Sci., 49 (1): 98–104.
  2. Boomiraj, K. 2003. Evaluation of organic sources of nutrients, panchagavya and botanicals spray on bhendi (Abelmoschus esculentus Moench.) M. Sc. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agric. Univ., Coimbatore. 
  3. Daniela, O., Stefan, P., Marek, C., Katarzyna, K. and Dariusz, G. 2008. Biomass accumulation of photosynthetic active radiation by rapeseed plants depending on sulphur fertilization. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4 (2), 133 – 136.
  4. Deshmukh, K.K., Khatik, S.K. and Dubey, D.P. 2005. Effect of integrated use of inorganic, organic and biofertilizers on production, nutrient availability and economic feasibility of soybean grown on soils of Kaymore Plateau and Satpura hills. J. Soils and Crops, 15 (1): 21-25.
  5. Dinesh Kumar, Y.K., Vishwanath Vithal Navi, A.P., Anand, M.R. and Atheek. H.M. Rahman. U.R. 2007. Influence of chemical and organic amendments on microbial biomass during composting. J. Ecobiol., 2 (3): 247–250.
  6. Hassink, J., Lebbink, G. and Van Veena, J.A. 1991. Microbial biomass and activity of a reclaimed - polder soil under a conventional or a reduced - input farming system. Soil Biol. Biochem., 23: 507–513.
  7. Krishnakumar, R. Saravanan, A., Rajesh, V. and Mayilsamy, P. 2007. Impact of organic farming on biological properties of rice (Oryza sativa) grown soil. J. Ecobiol., 20 (3): 275–280.
  8. Lakshmikanti Bhoi, Pramod Chandra Mishra. 2012.Changes in Bacterial Density, CO2 Evolution and Enzyme Activities in Poultry Dung Amended Soil.  Open Journal of Soil Science, 2012, 2, 196-201.
  9. Malik, M.A., Khan, K.S., Marschner, P. and Fayyaz-ul-Hassan. 2013. Microbial biomass, nutrient availability and nutrient uptake by wheat in two soils with organic amendments. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 13 (4), 955-966.
  10. Manna, M.C., Kundu, S., Singh, M. and Takkar, P.N. 1996. Influence of farmyard manure on dynamics of microbial biomass and its turn over and activity of enzymes under a soybean-wheat system on a Typic Haplustert. J. Indian. Soc. Soil. Sci., 44 (3): 409–412.
  11. Muhammad Farhan Sarwar, Muhammad Haroon Sarwar, Muhammad Sarwar,Niaz Ahmad Qadriand Safia Moghal. 2013. The role of oilseeds nutrition in human health: A critical review. Journal of Cereals and Oilseeds, 4(8), 97-100.
  12. Naser, A. .Anjum , Sarvajeet, S.Gill,  Shahid Umar, Igbal Ahmed, Armando C. Duarte. and Eduarda Pereira.  2012. Improving growth and productivity of Oliferous brassica under changing environment. Significance of nitrogen and sulphur nutrient and underlying mechanisms. The Scientific world Journal, 12.
  13. Nur, O., Ahmet, A., Muzaffer, C., Selcuk, G. and Huseyin, H.K. 2009. Microbial biomass and enzyme activity in vineyard soils under organic and conventional farming systems. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 33(4), 413-423.
  14. Panse, V.C. and Sukhatme, P.V. 1967. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers, ICAR, New Delhi.
  15. Patra, D.D., Bhandri, S.C. and Misra, A. 1992. Effect of plant residue on the size of microbial biomass and nitrogen mineralization in soil. Incorporation of cowpea and wheat straw. Soil Sci. and Pl. Nutri., 38 (1): 1-6.
  16. Rasse, D.P., Rumpel, C. and Dignac, M. 2005.Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilization. Plant and Soil, 269, 341- 356.
  17. Singh, R and Sharma, M.P. 1997. Effect of phosphorus and sulphur on greengram (Phaseolus radiata). Indian J. Agron., 42: 650–652.
  18. Subrahmaniyan, K., Kalaiselvan, P. and Arulmozhi, N. 1999. Nutrition management in groundnut based cropping system. Legume Res., 22 (2): 124-126.
  19. Yadav, R.S., Yadav, P.C. and Dhama, S. 2003. Integrated nutrient management in wheat (Triticum aestivum) – mungbean (Phaseolus radiatus) cropping sequence in arid region. Indian J. Agron., 48 (1): 23 – 26.
  20. Yadav, B.K. and Christopher, L. A. 2007. Effect of organic manures applied to rice crop on microbial population and enzyme activity in post harvest soil. J. Ecobiol., 20 (2): 139–144.
  21. Yadav, S.K., Khokar, U.V. and Yadav, R.P. 2010. 15. Integrated nutrient management for strawberry cultivation. Indian journal of horticulture, 67: 445-49.

600 ATLANTIC AVE, BOSTON,
MA 02210, USA
+001-6179630233
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - 2016 American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.