Journal of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 4, October 2015 Publish Date: Sep. 1, 2015 Pages: 168-177

The Impact of Some Agricultural Management Practidces on Growth, Yield of Proboscidea parviflora

Taha M. Sharief1, *, Mustafa M. Ali Elbala2

1Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zalingei, Zalingei, Sudan

2Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan

Abstract

In order to study the effect of sowing date, plant spacing and urea application on growth component and yield component and the antimicrobial activities of Proboscidea parviflora a field experiment was carried out in the split-split plot design with the three sowing dates as the main-plot i.e. (Summer), (Autumn) and (Winter) and three levels of nitrogen as sub plot (N0), (N1) and (N2), and three plant spacing sub-plot i.e. (45 cm), (60 cm) and (75 cm) apart in the ridge at the experimental farm of the University of Khartoum, at Shambat, Sudan during 2007-2008 cropping season. The results showed that seed yield was significantly affected by sowing time, planting spacing and N application. The three ways interaction was significant among seed yield was significant in both years, and highest value of yield was recorded in summer associated with 50kg urea/fed and the widest planting spacing (75cm.) in both years. The highest values of oil percentage in seed were associated with summer sowing followed by winter. Addition of N affected oil yield negatively so do plant spacing. The interaction between sowing time and N application on oil content was significant, while it’s wasn’t between the other factors studied. The two mould species were affected and controlled by the alcoholic extract of the leaves and stems of Proboscidea parviflora. Alcohol also had affected the mould by inhibiting their growth but lesser than leaves extract. The effect of stem extract was better than leaves extracts and alcohol against the two fungi.

Keywords

Edible Oil, Baskets, Martyniaceae, Snake Bite, Medicinal Plant


1. Introduction

The use of botanical raw material is in many cases much cheaper than using alternative chemical substances. An estimated number of 70,000 plant species are used in folk medicine worldwide (Farnsworth and Soejarto 1991). As a consequence, there is an enormous demand in plants – for domestic use and for commercial trade–resulting in a huge trade on local, regional, national and international level. As the production of botanicals still relies to a large degree on wild-collection (Bhattarai 1997; He and Ning 1997; Lange 1998; 2002; Robbins 1999; Kathe et al., 2003), profound knowledge of trade, size, structure and reams as well as of commodities, traded quantities and their origin is essential for assessing its impact on the plant populations concerned.

Devil's claws are best characterized by their long, pointed claws. When dry, hooked claw readily attaches to passing furry-legged mammals, including the sock-wearing variety (Bertting, 1982). Devil's claw or cat's claw (English), Una de gato has been founded in Zalingei a few years ago and used traditionally by the practioners to remedy scorpion and snake bite, also in magic for preparing some medicine, and they called it Damin Asharah.

Proboscidea parviflora (Martyniaceae) belongs to a small New World family comprised of a small number of species from even fewer genera. It is often cited as belonging to the family Martyniaceae, so some sources have placed it in the same family as sesame (Pedliaceae).

The claws of the mature seedpods of devil's claw were collected in autumn, split and used to create black basketry designs by many tribes in southern California and the Southwest. These tribes include the Chemehuevi, Kawaiisu, Owens Valley Paiute, Tubatulabal, Havasupai, Papago, and Pima. Because the claws are durable, they were often used to construct the base of baskets among the Papago and Pima. The material is still gathered wild or plants are cultivated in home gardens by contemporary weavers. The Papago used the young pods as food, while the Pima cracked the seeds between the teeth and ate them like pine-nuts. To treat rheumatic pains, the Pima broke off a small piece of the claw and pressed it into the flesh, then lighted it and allowed it to burn (Rea, 1997).

2. Material and Methods

The experiments was conducted for two consecutive seasons during the year 2006/07 and 2007/08 in the Demonstrated Farm of the Faculty of Agriculture at Shambat (Latitude 15° 40¯ N, longitude 32° 32¯) and altitude 280 M above sea level) the soil of the experimental site is clay (fine Montmorilonitic, Isoherperthermic, Entic Chromustert, and it's Physical properties as described by Mohammed (1999) are shown in Appendix Table 2.

The climate of the experimental site is semi – desert, with mean annual rainfall about 100 – 200 mm. and with maximum temperature about 42°C in summer and the minimum around 12°C in winter (Adam, 1996). Monthly mean maximum and minimum temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, and total rainfall were recorded for the two seasons

The Seeds:

The seeds used in this experiment were collected from the area of Zalingei Province in Western Darfur State; where the plant grows wildly around the area.

Experimental Treatments:

The experiment was designed to study the effect of sowing date, nitrogen fertilizer, and plant population on growth and yield of devil's claw as follow:

Sowing date:

First of April. 13\4

First of August. 1\8

First of November. 12\11

Nitrogen Fertilizer Application:

Control.

50 kg Urea / fed.

100 kg Urea / fed.

Plant Spacing:

1.   45 cm. between plants.

2.   60 cm. between plants.

3.   75 cm. between plants.

Data collection:

Data were collected on the following parameters from five tagged plants from each plot which were counted weekly.

Growth parameter:

1.   Plant Height (cm).

2.   Number of leaves/plant.

3.   Number of the Branches per plant.

4.   Number of the sub Branches per plant.

Reproductive parameters:

1.   Number of Fruits:

Numbers of fruits were counted weekly when its start ripening and finally the mean number of the fruits per plant.

2.   Number of seeds per plant:

 Number of seed per capsule was counted from the tagged plants.

3.   1000 Seeds Weigh:

1000 seed weight was determined by weighing a five replicate of 1000 seeds each using sensitive balance.

4.   Dry Matter:

Determined by weighing the fresh weight and the dry weight of the whole plant of the five plants and calculate the variation between them to find out the percentage.

Oil Extractions:

Total oil content of the seed was determined according to Calmen (1970), as follows:

Finely ground seeds were extracted by petroleum ether (60–80ºC) in continuous soxhelt extracting apparatus. The ground sample (20g) was accurately weighed in an empty thimble of known weight plugged with a piece of cotton wool then the thimble with the materials was placed in soxhelt extractor.

3. Result and Discussion

Effect of Sowing Date, Planting Spacing and N Fertilizer on 50% Emergence and Flowering:

Summer, autumn and winter sowing dates were characterized by the same number days to 50% emergence during both years. This might be due to the similarity of minimum temperature (26.6-31°C), which prevailed during the germination period. This result agrees with the finding of Kandri et al., 2008 who reported that increasing the temperature reduces days to 50% germination (Table No 1).

Sowing date affected on flowering of Proboscidea parviflora, due to temperature and light that have an induction effect on flowering. The number of days to 50% flowering was on the other hand shorter in summer and autumn (20 days) than winter (25 days) in the first year, while in the next year they reached 50% flowering after (20 days) this could be attributed to relatively wide range of temperature during vegetative growth which might have helped in earlier induction of flowering (Table No 1). The results obtained from the present experiment agree with the findings of Burgstaler (1984) who reported that increasing in temperature decreases days of flowering of Lipidium sativum L.

Table (1). Days to 50% Emergence and Flowering.

  First Year Second Year
50% Emergence 50% Flowering 50% Emergence 50% Flowering
Days Days Days Days
Summer 4 20 3 20
Autumn 3 20 4 20
Winter 4 25 4 20

Effect of Sowing Date, Planting Spacing and N Fertilizer on Growth and Growth Parameters:

Data Presented in Tables (2-3) indicated that all vegetative growth were significantly affected by sowing dates. Plants sown in summer gave the highest values for all parameters (Plant Height and number of Sub-branches but not for number of leaves where the highest values recoded in autumn followed by summer and winter) for both years, and for number of branches where the greatest values recorded in summer in the first year and autumn in the second year, therefore, it was reflect positively on the growth and yield component in contrast with winter sowing date. The significant effect of sowing dates might be attributed to the fact that their plants had enough time to produce their maximum vegetative growth before weather condition was conductive to flower induction i.e. prevalence of high temperature. On the other hand with late sowing dates flower inducing environment prevailed before plants had reached their maximum vegetative growth capacity.

The two way interactions between factors studied showed highly significant (P= 0.05) among plant height and no of leaves, no of branches and no of secondary branches in both year.

The three ways interaction showed significant difference among plant height only in the first year, while for number of leaves/plant and number of branches/plant the three way interaction resulted in significant different only in the second year. There were no significant differences among number of secondary branches in the three way interaction in both years.

These results confirm the observations of Ramzan et al., (1992) who reported that plant height was generally reduced in delayed sowing in case of mung-bean, Also the finding of Sharif (2003) who stated that the highest plant height of okra was recorded when Okra was sawn on March (summer). The reported results also agrees with Malik et al., (2006) who confirmed that sowing dates and planting patterns on growth and yield of Vigna radiate had significant effect on plant height. Significantly higher plant height (85.51 cm) was attained in D1 (3rd week of June sowing) while minimum plant height (64.73 cm) was recorded in D3 (3rd week of July sowing). Similar observations were found in the study of Naguib et al., (2007) who stated that plants sown in October produced the highest plant height than those sown in December.

Planting spacing affect number of leaves significantly, plants sown in autumn produced the greatest values of leaves followed by summer and winter in both seasons. AL Abdulsalam and Hamaiel (2004) studied the Effect of Planting Dates and Compouned Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Hassawi Onion under Al-Hassa Oasis Conditions reported that the plant growth parameter increased significantly for October than September and November planting dates, except neck shape index which was significantly higher for November than other planting dates. The significant higher growth in October could be due to moderate climatic condition than either September (being relatively hot) or November (being relatively cool) months. Because extreme climatic. Conditions during September and November, might have advance affected the condition and plant growth than October plantation. Similar results are observed by other investigators. This finding was in conformity with the findings of Naguib et al., (2007) who studied the Response of Ruta graveolens L. to Sowing Dates and Foliar Micronutrients stated that seeds planted on 1st of October, produced significantly the highest plants, more branches and the heaviest weight of leaves and stems, compared to those planted on the 1st of November. The reported results also agrees with Malik et al., (2006) who stated that sowing dates and planting patterns significantly affected the leaf area per plant at flowering. Maximum leaf area (1465.72 cm2) was produced by D1 (3rd week of June) against minimum (1141.34 cm2) by D3 (3rd week of July). Maximum leaf area in D1 may be due to long vegetative period and high rainfall which favored more vegetative growth.

Number of branches and sub-branches was affected significantly by time of sowing in the two years. The highest values were produced in the first sowing date (Summer) followed by Autumn and Winter this might be due to short vegetative growth period and long reproductive growth period. These results confirmed with the finding of Malik et al., (2006) who said that maximum number of pod bearing branches (5.8) was attained by D3. Significantly minimum number of fruit bearing branches (3.36) was recorded in D1. These findings confirm the findings of Alam et al., (2007) who confirmed that the highest number of branches plant-1 (5.20) was obtained in 26 February sowing which was statistically different from 10 and 22 March sowing (4.68 and 4.48).

The differences in plants height were not significantly different in the first season while there were significant (P= 0.05) differences among fertilizer applications. The longer plants in height produced in application of 50 kg Urea/ fed. While more rates of Urea decreases plant height. Urea fertilizer affects leaves production negatively. Number of leaves decreases with the increase of Urea. The effect of fertilizer on number of branches and sub-branches were not significantly different in both of the two seasons. These results confirmed the finding of Makinde et al., 2007 who said that the average number of leaves per plant was significantly affected by fertilizer applications? 4 tons ha-1had an average of 68 leaves per plant at 4 WAP, which was significantly higher than the 39 leaves per plant, observed from the control plots. Similar observation agrees with the findings of Salem (2006) who studied the Effect of Nitrogen Levels, Plant Spacing and Time of Farmyard Manure Application on the Productivity of Rice and stated that the interaction between time of FYM application and nitrogen levels on leaf area index was significant in both seasons.

Table (2). Effect of sowing date, plant spacing and N fertilizer on 1000 seed weight in the 1st year (kg).

The Main Effects

Date   Fertilizer   Spacing  
Summer 75.74a N0 69.15a S1 68.12b
Autumn 53.49b N1 71.74a S2 71.09ab
Winter 82.63a N2 70.96a S3 72.64a
LSD 0.05 7.38*   4.27*   4.19*

The Effects of Two Way Interaction

  N0 N1 N2 45 60 75   45 60 75
Summer 74.8b 73.8b 78.5ab 76a 76.2a 75a N0 65.27b 69ab 72.8a
Autumn 52.2c 56.9c 51.2c 47.1c 53bc 59.7b N1 70.1ab 69.5ab 75.6a
Winter 80.3ab 84.4a 83.1ab 81.1a 83.5a 83.1a N2 69ab 74a 69.4ab
LSD 0.05 7.39* 9.35*   7.3*

The Effects of Three Way Interaction

  N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2
Summer Autumn Winter
S1 74.3a 73ab 77.3a 46.7c 52.1c 57.8bc 74.7a 82.8a 83.4a
S2 77.5a 72ab 72ab 47.6c 52.1c 71.2ab 85.2a 84.5a 83.6a
S3 76.1a 83.6a 75.6a 47.2c 56.3c 50.2c 83.6a 83.1a 82.5a
LSD 0.05   15.59*  

Table (3). Effect of sowing date, plant spacing and N fertilizer on 1000 seed weight in the 2nd year (kg).

The Main Effects

Date   Fertilizer   Spacing  
Summer 48.03c N0 52.65a S1 52.73a
Autumn 51.26b N1 52.28a S2 51.70a
Winter 57.58a N2 51.95a S3 52.45a
LSD 0.05 2.88*   1.87   1.68*

The Effects of Two Way Interaction

  N0 N1 N2 45 60 75   45 60 75
Summer 49.49bc 46.58c 48.03bc 48.9bcd 47.43d 47.77bcd N0 52.2a 52.83a 52.91a
Autumn 51.98b 50.98b 50.91b 51.41bc 50.02bcd 52.35b N1 52.76a 51.61a 52.47a
Winter 56.56a 59.29a 56.91a 57.89a 57.64a 57.23a N2 53.24a 50.65a 51.96a
LSD 0.05 3.89* 2.7   2.92

The Effects of Three Way Interaction

  N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2
  Summer Autumn Winter
S1 49.07 46.61 51.04 51.71 51.94 50.57 55.84 59.73 58.11
S2 49.96 46.43 45.09 51.32 49.47 49.28 57.21 58.94 56.77
S3 49.45 46.7 47.16 52.66 51.52 52.88 56.63 59.2 55.85
LSD 0.05   6.14  

Table (4). Effect of Sowing date, Plant Spacing and N fertilizer on Plant Height 8th Week in the First Year (cm.).

The Main Effects

Date   Fertilizer   Spacing  
Summer 83.56a N0 59.95a S1 64.3a
Autumn 59.24b N1 60.54a S2 60.42b
Winter 37.57c N2 59.88a S3 55.64c
LSD 0.05 5.19*   4.93*   2.12*

The Effects of Two Way Interaction

  N0 N1 N2 45 60 75   45 60 75
Summer 82.3a 83.1a 85.2a 87.8a 84.6a 78.1b N0 65.26a 59.03bcd 55.5cd
Autumn 61.5b 59.08b 57.1b 64.2c 59.9d 53.5e N1 63.8ab 61.7ab 55.9cd
Winter 36.04c 39.3c 37.3c 40.7f 36.7g 35.2g N2 63.7ab 60.4abc 55.4d
LSD 0.05 8.64 5.93*   5.78*

The Effects of Three Way Interaction

  N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2
  Summer Autumn Winter
S1 85.33 86.53 91.73 70.5 63.0 59.26 39.93 42.2 40.26
S2 82.5 84.8 86.73 59.46 62.3 57.93 35.13 38.2 36.8
S3 79.06 78.16 77.3 54.6 51.93 54.13 33.06 37.8 34.86
LSD 0.05   10.47*  

Table (5). Effect of Sowing date, Plant Spacing and N fertilizer on Plant Height 8th Week in the Second Year (cm.).

The Main Effects

Date   Fertilizer   Spacing  
Summer 71.13a N0 61.16b S1 67.8a
Autumn 60.95b N1 63.91a S2 61.92b
Winter 55.80c N2 62.82ab S3 58.16c
LSD 0.05 1.68*   1.8*   1.01*

The Effects of Two Way Interaction

  N0 N1 N2 45 60 75   45 60 75
Summer 71.33a 71.33a 70.73a 74.93a 70.73b 67.73c N0 66.08a 60.37c 56.26d
Autumn 60.42b 61.35b 61.08b 65.35d 60.84f 56.66g N1 68.48a 62.88b 60.35c
Winter 51.73d 59.04bc 56.64c 63.13e 54.2h 50.08i N2 68.08a 62.51bc 57.86d
LSD 0.05 3.04* 2.18*   2.30*

The Effects of Three Way Interaction

  N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2
  Summer Autumn Winter
S1 75.46 74.33 75.0 64.4 65.66 66.0 60.66 65.46 63.26
S2 70.66 70.66 70.86 60.93 60.66 60.93 49.53 57.33 55.73
S3 67.86 69.0 66.33 55.93 57.73 56.33 45.0 54.33 50.93
LSD 0.05   4.04  

Effect of Sowing Date, Planting Spacing and N Fertilizer on Yield and Yield Components:

Data presented in Tables (2-9) showed that all yield and yield parameters are affect by sowing dates significantly. Similar observation agrees with Moniruzzman (2007) who studied the Response of Okra Seed Crop to Sowing Time and Plant Spacing in South eastern Hilly Region of Bangladesh stated that there was no significant difference in seed yield per hectare among the above four treatment combinations.

Also agrees with Alam et al., 2007 studied (Sesamum indicum L.) they reported that the highest number of branches plant-l, capsules plant-l, seeds capsule-l, seed yield (kg ha-l) were statistically identical to 10th March sowing except plant height, number of branches and capsule plant-l but all of them were recorded significantly lowest in 22 March sowing compared to first sowing. The highest seed yield (251.30kg ha-l) was obtained in 26 February sowing and thereafter reduced with delay in sowing.

These result are quite similar to the findings of Ozer (2003) who studied sowing date and nitrogen rate effects on growth, yield and yield components of two summer rapeseed cult Significant differences in branch numbers per plant occurred between the various spacing between rows. Generally, an increase in row spacing led to significantly higher branching. Another observation confirmed the findings of Carvalho et al., who found that the number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, 1000-seed weight and seed yield were evaluated. Sowing on the first 2 weeks of May recorded a better seed yield than sowing on the first 2 weeks of July. Row spacing is another function, which affected the growth behavior of the cultivar.

This was consistent with the findings of Ali et al., (1996), who reported that low density resulted in an increased number of branches per plant. The highest number of pods per plant was recorded for 45 cm row spacing. The differences in this character between the three rows spacing (15, 30 and 45 cm) were large. Similarly, Momoh and Zhou (2001) stated that the number of effective branches and pods per branch decreased with increasing plant density Ibrahim et al., (1989) who studied the Response of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) growth, yield, oil content and its fatty acids to nitrogen rates and application times and reported that high oil contents were correlated with cooler spring temperatures. Others also have found that oil content occurred when rapeseed was seeded in early May rather than toward the middle or end of June (Johnson et al., 1995). It is likely that increased temperature and water stress during seed filling was a major cause of reduced oil concentration due to late sowing (Hocking and Stapper, 2001).

Similar observation confirmed the findings of Gesch et al., 2002 who stated that the highest seed oil content found was for the 1st June sowing in 2000, which was 284g kg1. This is slightly lower than that previously reported (Knapp and Crane, 2000).

Plants developed from seed sown before June tended to form morebranches and accumulated a greater amount of aboveground biomass.Typically, there was a distinct decrease in plant biomass accumulationand most seed yield components when sowing date was delayeduntil June. Cuphea can be successfully grown in the northernCorn Belt, with early to mid-May being the best time for sowing.Seed oil yield per hectare mirrored seed yield because seed oil content was relatively stable across sowing dates. The best sowing date for total oil yield was not as clear in 2000, as differences across the 15 April to 1 June were smaller than in 1999. Also agrees with Wilczewski1 et al., (2006) who reported that the nitrogen fertilization applied in the experiments significantly increased the over ground plant biomass yield of the crops researched. The greatest reaction to N fertilization was demonstrated by oil radish. The dry matter yield of this plant increased by 26.5% due to the application of 45 kg/ha, as compared with the yield collected from unfertilized objects. Increasing the nitrogen dose from 45 to 90 kg·ha-1 resulted in an 18.4% increase in the dry matter yield of radish. Also with the findings of Sarma and Kanjilal (2000), in India, who studied the effect of planting time and row spacing on growth and yield of patchouli (Progesterone patchouli Benth). They found that oil content and quality of oil as measured by the patchouli alcohol (64.2-66.1%) was not affected by planting time as well as spacing. While Ram, et al. (1998), found that planting of Mary gold (Tagetes minuta) in mid-October at 45×45cm, resulted in maximum oil yield with increase in plant height.

Data in Tables (10-11) indicated that the methanolic extracts of Proboscidea parviflora had significant effect on Alternaia spp. and Fusarium oxysporium. Khalil, (2001) reported that aqueous extracts of fruits and leaves of Capsicum fruitscens, Capsicum annum (Solanaceae) and Nerium oleander (Apocynaceae) inhibited the germination of Alternaria solani spores and decreased the mycelia dry weight of Alternaria solani and Saprolengnia. Similar observations was recorded by Tequida et al., 2002 who evaluated the alcoholic extracts of leaves and stems of Proboscidea parviflora against the mould species Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, Penicillium chrysogenum, Penicillium expansum, Fusarium poae and Fusarium moniliforme. They found that the Fusarium spp. and Penicillium spp. were controlled by Proboscidea parviflora.

Also this findings agrees with Shahidi et. al., (2004) who studied the methanol plant-extracts of 221 species from 98 families which had documented uses in Iranian herbal-medicine with antibacterial and antifungal activity against 11 standard bacterial strains and 3 fungal species. They reported that Proboscidea parviflora one of the useful plant used in there experiment.

Similar observations agree with the findings of Okigbo and Ogbonnaya (2006). Who reported that the ethanolic extraction of Ocimum gratissimum inhibited more than that of A. melegueta the two plants extracts inhibited the spores of Fusarium oxysporium and Aspergilus niger. This observation could be attributed to the antifungal properties of Proboscidea parviflora acting against the growth of fungal species.

Hassan et.al.,(2005) stated that the alcoholic extracts of neem and garlic completely inhibited the presence of Bipolaris sorokiniana, Fusarium spp., Aspergilus spp., Penicillium spp. and Rhizopus spp. respectively on treated wheat seeds, whereas the highest percentage of B. sorokiniana (11.67%), Fusariun spp.(24.33%), Aspergillus spp. (17.07%), Penicillium spp. (7.5%) and Rhizopus spp.(4.5%).

Table (6). Effect of sowing date, plant spacing and N fertilizer on number of leaves/ plant in the 1st year:

The Main Effects

Date   Fertilizer   Spacing  
Summer 79.65b N0 81.08a S1 76.94c
Autumn 99.05a N1 87.7a S2 85.75b
Winter 75.28b N2 85.2a S3 91.29a
LSD 0.05 8.98*   6.79*   2.97*

The Effects of Two Way Interaction

  N0 N1 N2 45 60 75   45 60 75
Summer 74.83b 81.33b 82.8b 75.46 81.14 82.37 N0 74.78 81.24 87.22
Autumn 97.29a 102.2a 97.67a 88.29 100.38 108.51 N1 80.51 88.62 93.97
Winter 71.13b 79.56b 75.16b 67.09 75.76 83.0 N2 75.53 87.41 92.67
LSD 0.05 13.06 5.15*   7.99*

The Effects of Three Way Interaction

  N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2
  Summer Autumn Winter
S1 72.43 76.93 77.0 87.87 91.87 85.13 64.07 72.73 64.47
S2 73.8 82.87 86.77 97.4 105.0 98.73 72.53 78.0 76.73
S3 78.27 84.2 84.63 106.6 109.8 109.13 76.8 87.93 84.27
LSD 0.05   15.59  

Table (7). Effect of sowing date, plant spacing and N fertilizer on number of leaves/ plant in the 2nd year:

The Main Effects

Date   Fertilizer   Spacing  
Summer 58.27b N0 54.15a S1 48.09c
Autumn 63.83a N1 53.43a S2 53.37b
Winter 37.57c N2 52.08a S3 58.21a
LSD 0.05 3.4*   2.92*   1.33*

The Effects of Two Way Interaction

  N0 N1 N2 45 60 75   45 60 75
Summer 59.1bc 60.24abc 55.46c 54.95d 57.51c 62.35b N0 50.08cd 54.13b 58.25a
Autumn 65.5a 63.08ab 62.91ab 56.62cd 64.86b 70.01a N1 48.53de 53.53bc 58.22a
Winter 37.86d 36.95d 37.88d 32.71g 37.73f 42.26e N2 45.66e 52.44bc 58.15a
LSD 0.05 5.32* 2.30*   3.47*

The Effects of Three Way Interaction

  N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2
  Summer Autumn Winter
S1 56.73 56.6 51.5 59.4 56.4 53.9 34.0 32.5 31.5
S2 59.0 59.2 54.3 65.8 63.8 64.9 37.6 37.5 38.0
S3 61.6 64.9 60.5 71.2 68.9 69.8 41.9 40.8 44.0
LSD 0.05   6.46*  

Table (8). Effect of Sowing Date, Plant Spacing and N Fertilizer on Oil Percentage in the 1st Year.

The Main Effects

Date   Fertilizer   Spacing  
Summer 2.48a N0 2.48a S1 2.46a
Autumn 2.19a N1 2.32b S2 2.21b
Winter 2.48a N2 2.35b S3 2.47a
LSD 0.05 0.41*   0.07*   0.15*

The Effects of Two Way Interaction

  N0 N1 N2 45 60 75   45 60 75
Summer 2.46 2.40 2.56 2.74 2.22 2.46 N0 2.54abc 2.58ab 2.32bcd
Autumn 2.24 2.18 2.16 2.35 1.95 2.28 N1 2.53abc 1.91e 2.52abc
Winter 2.74 2.37 2.33 2.28 2.47 2.68 N2 2.31cd 2.15d 2.59a
LSD 0.05 0.42* 0.46*   0.22*

The Effects of Three Way Interaction

  N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2
  Summer Autumn Winter
S1 2.67abcdef 2.8abc 2.77abc 2.58abcdefg 2.27defghi 2.19efghij 2.36cdefghi 2.53bcdefg 1.97hijk
S2 2.55abcdefg 1.67k 2.44bcdefgh 2.33cdefghi 1.86ijk 1.66k 2.87ab 2.19fghi 2.35cdefghi
S3 2.16ghijk 2.75abcd 2.48bcdefg 1.81jk 2.4cdefgh 2.62abcdefg 2.98a 2.4cdefgh 2.67abcde
LSD 0.05   0.50*  

Table (9). Effect of Sowing Date, Plant Spacing and N Fertilizer on Oil Percentage in the 2nd Year.

The Main Effects

Date   Fertilizer   Spacing  
Summer 2.82a N0 2.59a S1 2.59a
Autumn 2.41b N1 2.55a S2 2.67a
Winter 2.5ab N2 2.65a S3 2.52a
LSD 0.05 0.27*   0.20*   0.22*

The Effects of Two Way Interaction

  N0 N1 N2 45 60 75   45 60 75
Summer 2.94 2.65 2.87 2.77ab 2.95a 2.74abc N0 2.52a 2.79a 2.47a
Autumn 2.24 2.64 2.34 2.35cd 2.6abcd 2.27d N1 2.46a 2.62a 2.58a
Winter 2.60 2.36 2.72 2.66abcd 2.47bcd 2.56abcd N2 2.80a 2.62a 2.52a
LSD 0.05 0.39* 0.41*   0.37*

The Effects of Three Way Interaction

  N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2 N0 N1 N2
  Summer Autumn Winter
S1 2.55cdef 2.49cdef 3.25ab 2.58cdef 2.27defg 2.19efg 2.42cdefg 2.61bcdef 2.96abc
S2 3.50a 2.51cdef 2.85abcd 2.33cdefg 3.26ab 2.22defg 2.54cdef 2.09fg 2.78bcde
S3 2.76bcde 2.96abc 2.52cdef 1.81g 2.39cdefg 2.62bcdef 2.84bcd 2.39cdefg 2.43cdefg
LSD 0.05   0.64*  

Table (10). The effect of alcoholic extract of Proboscidea parviflora on Fusarium oxysporium

Treatment 24hr 48hr 72hr 96hr 120hr 144hr 168hr 48hr
Leaves extract 29.97a 35.1a 40.2b 42.56b 44.53c 49.33c 54.67c 35.1a
Stem extract 27.57a 31.5b 33.9b 37.33b 42.87c 49.43c 50.53c 31.5b
Alcohol 27.63a 32.3ab 36.9b 42.56b 52.76b 67.00b 69.77b 32.3ab
Control 27.23a 34.8ab 47.2a 55.53a 64.67a 77.90a 86.23a 34.8ab
LSD 0.05 3.06 3.35 6.58 8.42 3.37 5.31 5.46 3.35

Table (11). The effect of alcoholic extract of Proboscidea parviflora on Alternaria spp.

Treatment 24hr 48hr 72hr 96hr
Leaves extract 58.10a 65.30b 69.20b 7657b
Stem extract 55.00a 60.53d 66.47b 73.00b
Alcohol 57.20ab 63.10c 69.57b 75.63b
Control 57.50b 67.67a 82.90a 89.80a
LSD 0.05 2.43 2.15 6.32 4.01

4. Conclusions

In this experiment, nitrogen levels showed significant effects on Proboscidea parviflora yield. The highest seed yield associated with the medium amount of Nitrogen fertilizer (50 Kg/fed.). Winter sowing and 60 cm as plant spacing gave the highest yield of fruits and seed which are rich of oil .The alcoholic extracts leaves and stem of Proboscidea parviflora had significant effect on Alternaia spp. and Fusarium oxysporium, they decrease the number of the two mould better than alcohol alone.

References

  1. Adam, H. S. 1996. The Agricultural Climate. Dar Alassla Publication 1th ed.: 57. (In Arabic).
  2. Adekunle A.A., Duru C. and Odufuwa O.M. 2006. The Antifungal properties and Phytochmeical Screening of the Crude Extracts of Funtumia elastic and Mallotus oppsitifolius. South AfricaJournal of Botany. 69:568-571.
  3. AL Abdulsalam M. A. and Hamaiel A. F. 2004. Effect of Planting Dates and Compouned Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Hassawi Onion Under Al-Hassa Oasis Conditions. Scientific Journal of King Faisal University (Basic and Applied Sciences) Vol.5 No.1
  4. Araujo BSR. 1997. Activity evaluation fungicide and aflatoxigénica Excerpt plants in the state to control noise Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus. Thesis Profesional. University Sonora, Mexico.
  5. Arenas LC. DL50 de. 1995. siete insecticidas de diferentes grupos toxicológicos aplicados tópicamente a Prostephanus truncates (Horn) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). En:Memorias de la primera reunión nacional sobre la investigación en México del barrenador mayor de los granos Prostephanus truncatus (Horn). Pabellón de Arteaga, Pual.
  6. Beuchat LR., Golden DA., 1989 - Antimicrobials occurring naturally in Bhattarai, N.K., 1997. Biodiversity: people interface in Nepal. In: Bodeker, G., Bhat, K.K.S., Burley, J., eds. FAO, Rome, 78-86. Non-wood Forest Products nr. 11.
  7. Bretting P. K. 1982. Morphological Differentiation of Proboscidea parviflora ssp. Parviflora (Martyniaceae) Under Domestication. American Journal of Botany 69:1531.
  8. Burgstaller, H., M. B. Mohamed and M. S. Hassan. 1984. Annual Book of Vegetable Production and Vegetable Pest and Diseases in The Sudan. Sudanese German Plant Protection Programme. Plant Protection Department. Sudan. 55.
  9. Calmen, C. E. 1970. An Evaluation of Five Methods for The Quantitative Determination of Cyclopropenoids. Journal of Analytical Official Associated Chemistry Society. 53(6): 1209 – 1213.
  10. Cowam M.M., 1999 - Plant Products as Antimicrobial Agents. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 12: 564–582.
  11. Emori TG., Gaynes RP., 1993 - An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory. Clinical microbiology Reviews, 6: 428–442.
  12. Gesch R. W., Forcella F., Barbour N., Philips B., and Voorhees. 2002. Yield and Growth Response of Cuphea to Sowing Date. Crop Science, Vol. 42.
  13. Gorecki, P. 2002. Vitafoods und Kosmetika: Arzneipflanzen erobern sich neue Wirkungsbereiche. Drogenreport (28):9.
  14. Hassan M. M., Choodhury S. P., Shahidul Alam, Hossien B. and M. S. Alam. 2005. Antifungal Effects of Plant Extracts on seed-borne Fungi of Wheat Seed Regarding Seed Germination, Seedling Health and Vigor Index. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science. 8(9):1284-1289.
  15. Haston E, Richardson JE, Stevens PF, Chase, MW and Harris DJ. 2007. A linear sequence of Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II families. Taxon 56 (1): 7
  16. Hocking, P.J. and Stapper, M. 2001. Effect of sowing time and nitrogen fertilizer on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertilizer on Indian mustard. I. Dry matter production, grain yield, and yield components. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 52: 623–634.
  17. Johnson, B.L., McKay, K.R., Schneiter, A.A., Hanson, B.K. and Schatz, B.G. 1995. Influence of sowing date on canola and crambe production. J. Prod. Agric. 8: 594–599.
  18. Kandari, L. S., K. S. Rao, R. K. Maikhuri and Kusum Chauhan.2008. Effect of pre-sowing, temperature and light on the seed germination of Arnebia benthamii (Wall. Ex G. Don): An endangered medicinal plant of Central Himalaya, India. African Journal of Plant Science. Vol. 2(1): 5-11.
  19. Khalil, M. A. 2001. Phytofungitoxic properties in the aqueous extracts of some plants. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 4:392-394.
  20. Lange, D. 1996. Untersuchungen zum Heilpflanzenhandel in Deutsch land: ein Beitrag zun internationalen Atenschutz. Bundesamt für Naurschutz, Bonn-Bad Godesberg.
  21. López BMG. 1989. Plant extracts as alternative to control Rhyzopertha dominica (F) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) in wheat (Triticum durum) Stored. Stored. Tesis Profesional. University of Sonora, Mexico.
  22. Makinde E.A., O.T. Ayoola and M.O. Akande. 2007. Effects of Organo-mineral Fertilizer Application on the Growth and Yield of ‘Egusi’ Melon. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 1(1): 15-19.
  23. Malik, M. A.,Saleem, F. M., Ali A., and Ishaq A. F. 2006. The Effect of sowing Dates and Planting Pattern on Growth and Yield of Mungbean (Vigna radiatal. L) J. Agric. Res. 44(2).
  24. Mohammed, B. A. 1999. Effect of natural a monument on aggregate stability and water flow in different soil. MSc. Thesis (Agric.) U of K.
  25. Moreno ME, Gil GM. 1991. Biology Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxin production. Mexico DF, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.
  26. Naguib Y.N., M.S. Hussein, S.E. E Sherbeny, M.Y. Khalil and D. Lazari. 2007. Response of Ruta graveolens L. to Sowing Dates and Foliar Micronutrients. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3(11): 1534-1543.
  27. Ohrmann, R., 1991. Pflanzenextrakte in Haushaltsprodukten. Dragoco Report (Holzminden) (3), 67-76.
  28. Ortega N. M.,Robles b. M. R.,Vazquez L. 2003. Nutritional and Sensorial evaluation of Proboscidea parviflora (Cat's claw) oil. Grasas-y-Aceites. Entero-Marzo 54(1) 48-52.
  29. Ozer H. 2003. Sowing date and nitrogen rate effects on growth, yield and yield components of two summer rapeseed cultivars. European Journal of Agronomy. Vol. (19) : 453-463.
  30. Ram, P.; Patra, N. K; Singh, H. H. 1998. Effect of Planting Date and Spacing on Oil Yield Components of (Tagetes minuta). Journal of Medicinal and Adromatic Plant Science. 20(3):742-745.
  31. Ramzan, C.M., M.A. Nadeem, R.H. Khan and M.A. Khan. 1992. Effect of sowing date on mungbean seed yield under rainfed conditions. Pak. J. Agric. Res. 30(2):205-211.
  32. Salmas, S. Z., Golezan, K. G., and Moghbel, S. 2006. Effect of Sowing Date and Limited Irrigation on the Seed Yield and Quality of Dill (Anethum graveolens L.) Turk J Agric For. (30) 281-286.
  33. Sarma, P. C; Kanjlal, P. B. 2000. Effect of Planting Time and Row Spacing on Growth Yield and Quality of Patchouli (Pogostemon patchouli Benth). Advances in Plant Science. 13(1): 201-204.
  34. Sauer DB. 1992. Storage of cereal grains and their products. American Association of Cereal Chemistry. 4th Ed.
  35. Shahidi Bonjar G.H., S. Aghighi and 1A. Karimi Nik.2004. Antibacterial and Antifungal Survey in Plants used in Indigenous Herbal-Medicine of South East Regions of Iran. Journal of Biological Sciences 4 (3): 405-412.
  36. Sharief, A.E.; S.E. El-Kalla; A.T.El-Kassaby; M.S. Sultan and Nagwa A.A.El-Bossaty. 2003. Response of Some Short Duration Cultivars of Soy Bean and Sunflower to Intensive Cropping. Scientific Journal of King Faisal University (Basic and Applied Sciences) Vo.4 No. (1) 1424.
  37. Tequda M. M., Cortez M, Rosas B. EC., Lopez S. S. and Corrales M. C. 2002. Effect of Alcoholic extracts of Wild Plants on The Inhibition of Growth of Aspergillus falvus, Penecillium expansum, Fuasriummoniliforme and fusarium poae moulds. Revlberoa Micol. 19(2):8.
  38. Wilczewski E., Lemańczyk G., Skinder Z., and Sadowski C. 2006. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities. Vol. 9: 2 Tropic Agronomy.Aframomum melegueta) on postharvest yam (Dioscorea spp.) rot.
  39. Hassan M. M., Choodhury S. P., Shahidul Alam, Hossien B. and M. S. Alam. 2005. Antifungal Effects of Plant Extracts on seed-borne Fungi of Wheat Seed Regarding Seed Germination, Seedling Health and Vigor Index. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science. 8(9):1284-1289.
  40. Khalil, M. A. 2001. Phytofungitoxic properties in the aqueous extracts of some plants. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 4:392-394.
  41. Okigbo R. N. and Ogbonnaya, U. O. 2006. Antifungal effects of two.
  42. Shahidi Bonjar G.H., S. Aghighi and 1A. Karimi Nik.2004. Antibacterial and Antifungal Survey in Plants used in Indigenous Herbal-Medicine of South East Regions of Iran. Journal of Biological Sciences 4 (3): 405-412.
  43. Tequda M. M., Cortez M, Rosas B. EC., Lopez S. S. and Corrales M. C. 2002. Effect of Alcoholic extracts of Wild Plants on The Inhibition of Growth of Aspergillus falvus, Penecillium expansum, Fuasrium moniliforme and fusarium poae moulds. Revlberoa Micol. 19(2):8.

600 ATLANTIC AVE, BOSTON,
MA 02210, USA
+001-6179630233
AIS is an academia-oriented and non-commercial institute aiming at providing users with a way to quickly and easily get the academic and scientific information.
Copyright © 2014 - 2016 American Institute of Science except certain content provided by third parties.